Criticism of the fantastic beasts: crime of Grindelwald: it begins to be dark!



[ad_1]

The spin-off of "Harry Potter" "The fantastic beasts and where to find them" is probably the first and only blockbuster in history to emerge from a textbook of nature – although fictional -. Nevertheless, the initial plan also included two sequels. Meanwhile, five films were even made in 2024. No wonder, after all, the first part has generated more than $ 800 million worldwide and has attracted more than three and a half million visitors to the only cinemas in Germany . The fact that the series is based on a simple 128-page full lexicon also showed that, unlike Harry Potter's film adventures, none other than the author (writer) Joanne K. Rowling knows exactly where the story goes. trip.

In the case of "Fantastic Beasts 2: The Crime of Grindelwald"By director David YatesWho is responsible for all movies of the universe Potter since "The Order of the Phoenix", is already the answer in all cases: in extremely dark climates! The decision of the FSK already indicated: the continuation is published contrary to the predecessor, namely only from 12 years old. And for a good reason! Who, despite much opposition to the role of the eponymous villain committed Johnny Depp As the near-predecessor of Lord Voldemort, there is a really scary super villain who seems to know no limit in the battle to his own advantage. To compensate, of course there are also many fantastic beasts, charming acolytes and a player clearly ambivalent to the game Eddie Redmayne. Not to mention various revelations from Hogwarts' past where fans of "Harry Potter" will surely have more of a wet eye.

During his escape from the United States, the famous criminal Gellert Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) left a devastating wake. Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), responsible for the temporary arrest of the wizard, learns of the explosion that occurred when Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law) confidently turns to his former student. Due to an old oath, Dumbledore himself is not able to compete with Grindelwald. But he sees in Newt someone who could attack the wizarding terrorist. Along with sisters Tina (Katherine Waterston) and Queenie Goldstein (Alison Sudol), Muggles Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler) and a host of her beloved beasts, Newt travels to Paris, where the troupe suggests clues to the world. where is Grindelwald. And time is running out: followers of the black magician grow up regularly and have only one plan, namely to reinforce the world domination of pureblood wizards with all their strength …



Even before the title is inserted, it becomes clear: the tone of the "Crime of Grindelwald" is much clearer than that of "fantastic beasts and where we can find them". The Grindelwald escape from prison in Europe turns out to be a dark and brutal pursuit over the clouds, in which the fugitive does everything he can to get rid of his persecutors. When the lightning gushes and the rain falls from the sky, while Grindelwald disappears in the dark without worrying about the losses, we realize that the title of the film "The crime of Grindelwald" is not chosen without care These are crimes of a criminal, their dimensions may not match those of Lord Voldemort. But in terms of malignant tumor, Grindelwald can still cope with his successor. And with Grindelwald's dream of a world dominated by a ruling race, the current political tones of the world, which already resonate in the first film, can be clearly heard in the sequel. Johnny Depp ("Pirates of the Caribbean") puts himself at the service of this abyssal role: he embodies the magician snow-white, without any wink, poserei, or nickname (pseudo) cool. So seriously and especially seriously threatening, we have not seen Depp for a long time. Welcome!

In addition to the eponymous crime, of course, the second part continues to be dedicated to the fantastic Beasts. They are a welcome counterweight to the sad story surrounding the Grindelwald hunt. There are quite a few (new) animal creatures to admire, including Niffler, the sweet-sweet duck-sweet duck hybrid, again attracting the largest number of looks. But unlike many other movie series, where acolytes are brought to the fore, when the fans jump on them (yes, we hear the henchmen!), The producers distribute the attention here very consistently to all kinds of mythical creatures. In addition, most of his appearances are actually relevant for the progression of the plot: the Niffler is not only involved because he is very nice, but also because he help Newt and his friends at critical moments.

Scenes with animals in part wonderfully designed are not only important to allow a younger audience to breathe between exciting fights. They also make the biggest technical highlights. "Fantastic Beasts: Crime Grindelwald" is also much darker visually than its predecessor, but that does not change the fact that, in the literal sense of the term, fantastic CGI effects can be wonderfully happy. Thanks to their detailed animation, the Niffler moves even a few millimeters up and down (so nice!), And the authentic show of playing with them, you always believe that there are all these beings. And then, there are sumptuously landscaped decorations such as those of a circus community in Paris, all so animated that there is always something to be amazed in every nook and cranny, even in the nooks and crannies. It does not happen so much narrative things.

It is during the lush 134 minutes that we find again and again in the central part of the case. "Fantastic Beasts: The Crime of Grindelwald", you can say that it's not only for himself, but must also make the connection between two other films. Rowling obviously wants to expand her network already established in the first part, because it presents many new facets. However, it sometimes takes a little too much time. Thus, it once again clarifies the private (also in love) life of Newt and Co., which, from his point of view (still) very superficial, seems almost a soap opera. At the same time, the already familiar wizarding world of Potter's films is systematically expanded. The highlight is a return to Hogwarts – of course, true to the legendary theme of "Harry Potter" by John Williams. However, we do not want to reveal exactly what this consists of, for more difficult reasons, as well as for other more or less important revelations that deal with past characters already known from previous films and books.

But the most famous of the returnees is undoubtedly Albus Dumbledore, whom Jude Law ("Sherlock Holmes 2") very convincingly designates as a loyal Defense professor against the forces of evil. The friendly style, the mischievous twinkle in the eyes, the warm smile and the gray beard (!) Make Law an absolutely credible young Dumbledore, who, especially for a reason before the cinematic intensifies, intensified the attention brought to report: Will in "Fantastic Beasts 2" Now referred to Dumbledore's badual orientation or not? In fact, this fact could hardly be more important for the continuation of the plot. Because Yates puts before all in his film the loyalty of the magician towards his fellow in the center. And that has nothing to do with whether Dumbledore is gay or not.

Eddie Redmayne ("The Discovery of the Infinite"), winner of an Oscar, seems to have found something of his fate with the role of Newt Scamander. After the first part, you would not have imagined anything better for the figure of the animal lover. This time, however, he manages even better to emphasize the introverted side of his character, who is visibly attracted to the events of the opening film and still wants to do something to protect the wizarding world and not to disappoint his former mentor, Dumbledore. "Fantastic Beasts: The Crime of Grindelwald" does not present many twists, as announced in Twitter's first euphoric publications. But it remains pleasantly unpredictable until the end and finally ends with a juicy cliffhanger, which makes the waiting time until November 2020 seems terribly long.

Conclusion: "Fantastic Beasts: The Crime of Grindelwald" ventures into much darker climates than its predecessor – and harmoniously combines cute animals and a truly nasty Johnny Depp. So, the sequel, despite some bumps, especially in the central part, is absolutely moody for the next part – also because of the final bang, Potter fans have already pulled the ground under their feet.

[ad_2]
Source link