Crowdfunding promotes foolish and harmful treatments



[ad_1]

Two women launch crowdfunding campaign on the Internet / Rawpixel.com, stock.adobe.com

/Rawpixel.com, stock.adobe.com

Vancouver and Atlanta – Medical crowdfunding does not only fill the gaps in the insurance system in North America, but many Americans are also funding controversial and even potentially harmful therapies, as recent studies in the American Medical Journal show. (JAMA 2018; 319: 1935-1936 and 2018; 320: 1705-1706).

Homeopathy and naturopathic cancer treatments are not effective, many representatives of these complementary therapies are. The benefits of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in brain lesions are also refuted after many negative studies. We caution against stem cell-based in vitro therapies for brain damage or spinal cord injury because of the risks involved. In addition, the long-term administration of antibiotics for chronic Lyme disease has been badociated with more benefits in the context of a clinical trial.

However, treatments are popular with the public and crowdfunding portals offer people the opportunity to donate. Campaigns often do not have the expected success. According to Ford Vox research, of the US $ 27.3 million requested for 1,059 donations for these therapies between 2015 and 2017, a total of US $ 6.7 million was collected from the rehabilitation center. after a brain injury from Ford in Atlanta.

Homeopathy and naturopathy generate the most donations

Crowdfunding on homeopathic or naturopathic therapies was the most successful ($ 3.46 million), but $ 0.79 million was also donated to hyperbaric oxygen therapy for brain injury. Donations for stem cell therapies brought in $ 1.25 million for spinal cord injury and 0.59 million for brain damage. $ 0.69 million was donated for long-term antibiotic treatment in chronic Lyme disease.

Because treatments are partially prohibited in the United States, people often turn to clinics abroad. In homeopathy, German providers are also popular with American patients.

on the subject

Deutsches Ärzteblatt print

aerzteblatt.de

Jeremy Snyder of Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, Vancouver, badessed the risks in 408 stem cell therapy campaigns on "GoFundMe" and "YouCaring". In the call for donations, 43.6% of those surveyed said that the treatment was definitive or safe, 30.4% thought it was optimistic or optimistic and 15.4% said that it was "safe". he belonged to both categories. The potential risks were only identified in 36 of the 408 donations and, if so, they were rated as low, if any.

However, not all crowdfunding platforms allow unauthorized fundraising campaigns. In Germany, the startnext donation platform surprised only this year with censorship. After lengthy consultations and numerous reports of violations, an anti-vaccine film campaign was taken offline.

<! –

->

"Unvaccinated, healthy, happy" – under this motto, seimutig.tv has launched a project on the startnext donation platform. The money will consist of short films to present only happy families and without impunity. The "super-information" Web pages on the damage caused by a vaccine finally give enough. "This is not brave, but careless!" Tweet the doctor and once convinced

© heat / aerzteblatt.de

[ad_2]
Source link