[ad_1]
<div innerhtml = "
At the same time, images in the digital space are immediately tagged nailed with" hashtags. "Is this a curse or blessing for an unbiased view ?
It is a wish, and one must always understand the desire and the reality in a tense relationship with each other.This appropriation has great potential to move you and to try things, at the same time it's something that's economically exploited I think you have to renegotiate again and again and you have to try to limit economic exploitation, not in the sense that they do not happen, but that you do not can not be limited by them.
How to do it
By owning your own data – companies have to negotiate theoretically with you. It's like a road: do you have an infrastructure that should be usable for everyone, or can you use it only if you are able to pay for it? It's negotiating, that's politics. Of course, the economic recovery has an incredible potential for innovation. But there is also a potential for expropriation.
Do you see legal obstacles in the acquisition of images?
Copyright is currently at a stage where these things need to be renegotiated. The legal position is always that of the property. When you look at the proper productivity processes, they are always faster than the property. On the Internet, we think at first, everyone can do what he wants, until people say, wait a minute, it is not possible, we have to respect the property. From then on, the Internet became a space that was not as productive – productivity would have been much higher if you had released those property rights. But many people would have been expropriated. The law is always a new negotiation on the social contexts to frequent and the forms of production that we actually want to use. I am a big fan of saying: These are my data, and those who want to market must talk to me. I never understood why
Facebook could become public without all the people who were on Facebook being immediately involved – these are, so to speak, the factory workers.
">
At the same time tagged tagged with" hashtags. "Is it a curse or a blessing for an unbiased vision?
I believe you can never see without prejudices It's a wish, and you have to understand the desire and the reality in a tense relationship with each other. This ownership has great potential to move you and to try things, at the same time, it's 39, is something that is used economically.How to deal with? I think that one must renegotiate it again and again and that we have to try to limit the economic uses, not in the sense that they do not not occur, but that they can not be restricted by them.
How to do it
By owning your own data – companies have to negotiate theoretically with you. It's like a road: do you have an infrastructure that should be usable for everyone, or can you use it only if you are able to pay for it? It's negotiating, that's politics. Of course, the economic recovery has an incredible potential for innovation. But there is also a potential for expropriation.
Do you see legal obstacles in the acquisition of images?
Copyright is currently at a stage where these things need to be renegotiated. The legal position is always that of the property. When you look at the proper productivity processes, they are always faster than the property. On the Internet, we think at first, everyone can do what he wants, until people say, wait a minute, it is not possible, we have to respect the property. From then on, the Internet became a space that was not as productive – productivity would have been much higher if you had released those property rights. But many people would have been expropriated. The law is always a new negotiation on the social contexts to frequent and the forms of production that we actually want to use. I am a big fan of saying: These are my data, and those who want to market must talk to me. I never understood why
Facebook could be made public without all the people who were Facebook being involved immediately – these are, so to speak, the factory workers.
