[ad_1]
<div innerhtml = "
Pre-Installed Applications
The Commission launched the Android case in April 2015, accusing the Internet giant of abusing its dominant position a year later. Google The parent company Alphabet rejects the claims Android is developed in Google is free for device makers and can be changed by them too. I love
Gmail or bring cards to devices
Among other things, the Commission is disturbed by the fact that manufacturers of Android smartphones who want to integrate Google services, still a full set of eleven applications of the Internet Group on devices must bring. For example,
Google Chrome browser and Google device search, even if a manufacturer, for example, would like to install the platform of the Play Store application. Google believes that a minimal set of applications is needed because users could not use Google services properly.
In addition, the Brussels authority criticizes the "anti-fragmentation contract" according to the vendors of devices. with Google services can not sell at the same time also smartphones with modified versions of Android. The third allegation of the Commission is that Google does not share advertising revenues in the search application with device manufacturers unless it enjoys exclusivity over their telephones and tablets
Overall, the Commission considers the group's approach as an attempt to cover the market position of its online offers on mobile devices in an unfair manner compared to other providers Services. Android has a global market share of over 80% in smartphone sales. The only other relevant mobile operating system is the iOS platform of Apple iPhones . Competing systems such as Microsoft Windows Windows Phone or the Blackberry software had lost competition.
With the spread of smartphones, the use of online services such as Internet search or video sharing platform YouTube on mobile devices becomes a source of revenue more and more important for Google .
The Android case is the second antitrust case in Brussels against Google after shopping, in a third the service "AdSense for Search", in which other websites can integrate Google search masks. Among other things, the group limits the possibilities of these providers to display ads from Google rivals commission found.
">
Pre-installed applications
The commission had the Android procedure in April In 2015, the Internet giant was accused of abusing a dominant position a year later Google and parent company Alphabet reject claims Android is under development at Google is free for device manufacturers and can be modified by them, but there are limitations when using Google applications like
Gmail or bring cards to devices
Among other things, the Commission is disturbed by the fact that manufacturers of Android smartphones who want to integrate Google services, still a full set of eleven applications of the Internet Group on devices must bring. For example,
Google Chrome browser and Google device search, even if a manufacturer, for example, would like to install the platform of the Play Store application. Google believes that a minimal set of applications is needed because users could not use Google services properly.
In addition, the Brussels authority criticizes the "anti-fragmentation contract" according to the vendors of devices. with Google services can not sell at the same time also smartphones with modified versions of Android. The third allegation of the Commission is that Google does not share advertising revenues in the search application with device manufacturers unless it enjoys exclusivity over their telephones and tablets
Overall, the Commission considers the group's approach as an attempt to cover the market position of its online offers on mobile devices in an unfair manner compared to other providers Services. Android has a global market share of over 80% in smartphone sales. The only other relevant mobile operating system is the iOS platform of Apple iPhones . Competing systems such as Microsoft Windows Windows Phone or the Blackberry software had lost competition.
With the spread of smartphones, the use of online services such as Internet search or video sharing platform YouTube on mobile devices becomes a source of revenue more and more important for Google .
The Android case is the second antitrust case in Brussels against Google after shopping, in a third the service "AdSense for Search", in which other websites can integrate Google search masks. Among other things, the group limits the possibilities of these providers to advertise Google's rivals, the commission concluded.
