[ad_1]
<div innerhtml = "
was previously fined by the European Commission for million because of its dominant position in the market today. On Wednesday, the decision will be announced, as indicated in the preliminary reports. We have summarized the main questions and answers.
What raises the Commission of the EU [19659003] Google is accused of putting pressure on other smartphone manufacturers using Android Google Requires about Samsung Huawei or ] HTC that Google services such as the Chrome browser as well as the search engine on Android devices must be preinstalled to allow manufacturers Z Google PlayStore
A Google ] "Anti-fragment agreement "is designed to prohibit manufacturers from distributing devices with an Android fork that Google Apps like the Play Store are preinstalled.
The European Commissioner for Competition
Margrethe Vestager argues that Google takes advantage of its quasi-monopoly position to conclude these agreements. The agreements would continue to guarantee the supremacy of Google in the Internet ecosystem.
What does say about Google ?
There is no recent statement, but the Android manufacturer has claims in the past have already been rejected. A link with the Google Playstore with the Google search engine does not exist, it has been said so far. But manufacturers who pre-install Google Search would be involved in search revenue. According to Google pre-installation of the Chrome browser should be mandatory, but smartphone manufacturers could install a second browser in parallel and set it as the default browser.
What does the competition think?
] In the badog world, no one would think of allowing a powerful society such as Nestle to take over the infrastructure and stores of almost every supermarket and put them free of charge. the provision of supermarkets provided Do not offer products competing with Nestlé is criticized by the European competitor Cliqz, supplier of browsers and search engines. "The decision to force the opening of the dominant Android platform for other vendors is long overdue."
What consequences could the EU have for fine Google ? The decision could have a mbadive impact on the Android ecosystem. Google could eventually charge license fees for the Android software, which in turn could be pbaded on to customers. A mandatory choice for browsers for users to configure their Android device could also be a consequence
Google has he not already been fined?
Yes. The Commission of the EU imposed a record fine of 2.42 billion against Google less than a year ago. At the time, it was the price comparison service of Google that had been deliberately favored in the search results and the competitors' results had been downgraded. According to the Commissioner of Competition, gave Google an "illegal advantage".
Was it the highest fine ever imposed on Internet businesses
? Antitrust fine of 1.06 billion euros, the guard of the European competition in 2009 the chip company Intel had aufgegummt. We expect the punishment to be even higher this time. Should the
The EU has once again condemned Google to a record sentence, the Internet company still finds its way to European courts. Intel has been successfully beaten against its fines since 2012.
Is the Commission of the EU too harsh?
The Commissioner of Competition Vestager must continue to come back from resisting the criticism of being too strict with US companies. Although US companies are often affected by technological investigations, there are still cases in the auto parts industry of Japanese companies.
">
Google was previously adopted by the EU Commission sentenced to million for its market dominance today , and today, Tuesday, the Commission meets again to discuss another sentence, possibly at a record level, to announce the decision Wednesday, as indicated in the preliminary reports We have summarized The main questions and answers
What is the Commission of the EU Google before?
Google is accused of others smartphone manufacturers operating in the Use Android to put pressure on Google requires about Samsung Huawei or HTC requires that the services Google such as Chrome browser and search engine are preinstalled on the app like Android so that manufacturers can access Google PlayStore.
One of Google "Anti-Fragmentation Agreement" is designed to prohibit manufacturers from distributing devices equipped with a pre-installed Android fork with Google apps such as the Play Store .
The European Commissioner for Competition
Margrethe Vestager argues that Google takes advantage of its quasi-monopoly position to conclude these agreements. The agreements would continue to guarantee the supremacy of Google in the Internet ecosystem.
What does say about Google ?
There is no recent statement, but the Android manufacturer has claims in the past have already been rejected. A link with the Google Playstore with the Google search engine does not exist, it has been said so far. But manufacturers who pre-install Google Search would be involved in search revenue. According to Google pre-installation of the Chrome browser should be mandatory, but smartphone manufacturers could install a second browser in parallel and set it as the default browser.
What does the competition think? ] In the badog world, no one would think of allowing a powerful society such as Nestlé to take over the infrastructure and stores of almost all supermarkets and make them available free of charge. supermarkets provided Do not offer products competing with Nestlé is criticized by the European competitor Cliqz, supplier of browsers and search engines. "The decision to force the opening of the dominant Android platform for other vendors is long overdue."
What consequences could the EU have for fine Google ? The decision could have a mbadive impact on the Android ecosystem. Google could eventually charge license fees for the Android software, which in turn could be pbaded on to customers. A mandatory choice for browsers for users to configure their Android device could also be a consequence
Google has not already had to pay a fine?
Yes. The Commission of the EU imposed a record fine of 2.42 billion against Google less than a year ago. At the time, it was the price comparison service of Google that had been deliberately favored in the search results and the competitors' results had been downgraded. According to the competition commissioner, conferred on Google an "illegal advantage".
Was it the highest fine ever inflicted on Internet businesses up here?
The fine of 2017 was more than twice antitrust fine of 1.06 billion euros, the guard of European competition in 2009 the chip company Intel had aufgegummt. We expect the punishment to be even higher this time. Should the
The EU has once again condemned Google to a record sentence, the Internet company still finds its way to European courts. Intel has been successfully defeated against its fines since 2012.
Is the EU Commission too harsh?
The Commissioner of Competition Vestager must continue to come back from resisting the criticism of being too strict with American companies. Although US companies are often affected by research in the technology sector, but in Japanese companies, there have always been instances in the auto parts industry.
