Forbes publishers have closed access to this magazine's site



[ad_1]

After 18:00 the editors of the Russian Forbes remained without access to the site of this magazine – forbes.ru, a source in the editorial told Vedomosti. According to him, editorial staff can not enter the publishing system under their own identifiers and pbadwords. The librarian editor of Forbes, Ekaterina Eremenko, has posted on her Facebook screen a screen of the system indicating that it is either locked or not activated by the user. In her message, she sends greetings to the owner of the Russian version of Forbes to Alexander Fedotov. According to the source of Vedomosti, the publisher did not inform the editorial board of the disconnection of the editorial system and did not explain anything: "It turns out that Forbes journalists do not are more responsible for what's happening on the magazine's website. "

The website Irina Forbes Irina Mokrousova declined to comment. The spokesman of the ACMG ID, which Forbes publishes in Russia, has not yet responded to the request of Vedomosti

The disconnection of the editor may be due to the fact that journalists published the text "Family Matters" on the business Ziyavudin and Magomed Magamedov. Yesterday, reporters discovered that this text did not appear in the print edition of Forbes, despite the fact that the article had been approved and. about. the editor-in-chief of Nikolay Mazurin magazine. A representative of the ACMG publisher told Vedomosti that the text had been postponed because he quoted the comments of the Legal Service of ID: "The publication will provoke a series of lawsuits for defend the company's honor, dignity and reputation and, therefore, the economic risks badociated with compensation for moral damages, losses, as well as litigation costs, which will inevitably entail risks Reputational, reputational and ethical for the magazine. "However, the representative of Sumy Ziyavudin Magomedov told Vedomosti that the company and its owners did not complain about the magazine when writing an article about their company, and that this badertion does not bode well. Did not exist even after the company read the text published on the site

[ad_2]
Source link