Free radicals. In Russia, prices for housing and communal services will skyrocket. Who is to blame?

Residents will be notified of the response to such a threat, and law enforcement officials (police, Rosgvardia) will begin to monitor the behavior of residents and their guests and badess how much this corresponds to the anti-terrorism paradigm. . And, apparently, in the Russian revenue for utilities, a new line will appear soon: the funding will be allocated to the owners.

Among the main measures proposed by the project are the inspection of all buildings and the appropriation of a certain category of anti-terrorism security; close access to basements, attics and parking; Particularly alarming is the fact that "the procedure of financing activities to ensure the anti-terrorist protection of a residential building is approved by the owners of premises in a residential building at a general badembly of owners. " "Dom" has asked lawyers, security experts and housing and communal services how the bill, if pbaded, could affect ordinary Russians.

Leninist compensation "at the door, Natalia Nikolaeva, president of Dobrolyubova TSJ, 19, a member of the Public Housing and Communal Services Council under Duma deputy Galina Khovanskaya, is sure – The document will be completed formally, as in the case of the preparation of apartment buildings for the winter.To date, the Ministry of Construction can not face its direct responsibilities: many destructions of residential buildings throughout the Russian Federation are continuing because of demolition of load bearing structures or malfunction of gas equipment.Therefore, it is the next Potemkin village, nothing more. "

" A General Analysis from the bill allows us to conclude that he has to make some changes, "says Dmitry Rukhanov, partner of LawPro24.ru law firm. – The main unresolved issue: any sanctions for non-compliance, and to whom specifically they will be exchanged. It would be prudent to adopt the project as recommendations, rather than as mandatory obligations, as the main costs will accrue to the owners – to raise funds from other sources, to Exception of the budget of some government agencies, this seems impossible. "

Security must be respected by the authority, because its task is to ensure the safety of the population and, therefore, funding should be at its expense, but the project says the opposite" , says Ivashchenko Srbui, clarifies that paragraph 27 of the draft law allows to conclude that if there is a management company in the house, the responsibility for anti-terrorist activities is badumed by the owners and s & he there is no CC in the house, the person responsible will be monitored,

"I believe that even so large amounts in the payment documents can increase for homeowners, which will cause others disruptions and conflicts within the population – as well as contributions to the capital (engaged in the design and construction of housing). – Terrorist attacks in Russia over the last twenty years were mainly transport and mbad demonstrations. Of course, if we talk about regions where terrorist activity is high (say, the North Caucasus), then the measure of categorization of houses according to the likelihood of an attack to strengthen their protection is correct. Timur Hutov, head of the criminal practice of the law firm BMS Law Firm, recalls that restricting access to cellars on rooftops and attics, underground garages and parking lots is useless for the most part from the country. , as the bill says, has already been implemented in most Russian homes, and if not, a significant amount for each of the tenants, given their number in the building, it is unlikely that this results

the house already has the necessary anti-terrorist security standards, such as intercom, concierge, video surveillance systems, control of basements and common areas, etc., adds Zulfiya Atakhanova, attorney of the Moscow Bar Association. "The proposed measures are more applicable to places with large concentrations of people, such as shopping centers, metro, cinemas, etc., where the level of security of the population should be more cautious."

The representatives of the security services have their own opinion. Dmitry Chernov, commercial director for the development of security company Caesar, points out that the bill has its advantages: "The idea of ​​categorizing housing districts is not bad. rules are clearly defined, the more they are clearly executed.But why the idea of ​​protection against terrorism appeared now is not entirely clear.Luckily, there have been no d & rsquo; Terrorist attacks in apartment buildings for a long time – more and more errors of builders or domestic tragedies. "

As the main difficulties that would imply the adoption of the law in its current form. the charge on the authorities and management companies, which are already constantly charged with turnover. Second, lacks clarity on the question of whether private security organizations may be involved in the installation and monitoring of security systems: "The attractiveness of the forces of the The order and extra-departmental protection of Rosgvardia will result in uncompetitive prices. " Moreover, as the representative of the security organization rightly remarks, the costs of implementing counter-terrorism measures will accrue to the residents. "And if in long-term homes there are barriers, access control systems, alarms, etc., then in the mbad segment these are high exceptional costs," says L & # 39; expert. "You have to give credit, access to cellars, attics and roofs is closed in the vast majority of residential establishments". And finally, the expert insists on the inclusion of members of the public in the commissions.

The question remains how much homeowners will have to pay apartments to pay for anti-terrorist activities." Security systems are not an expensive pleasure, therefore, they are installed entirely in new buildings business clbad and higher, "says Timur Kalandarov. – Only the organization and installation of a surveillance system for a four-entry house will cost 20,000 rubles at a single cost. And we are only talking about cameras – this is only part of the security system, and not the hardest part. Intelligent access control, sensors of explosive or toxic substances will cost many times more. I believe that the line in the receipt for the payment of housing and communal services "anti-terrorist measures" can be from 500 to 150000 monthly rubles for each owner. "

Dmitry Zatsarinsky's lawyer is even less optimistic." All measures listed in the project will impose additional costs on homeowners, on average in the country – at a rate of about 2 thousand rubles per months. "According to the expert, many owners simply ignore this receipt point.

Timur Kalandarov proposes his alternative to the project on the basis of the set of building rules" Anti-Terrorist Protection of Buildings and Buildings ". structures which provides for most of the technical measures necessary for housing security including against terrorist attacks.But this code is not included in the list of standards that are mandatory for developers, which means that 39 it is done voluntarily or partially (or not at all, so as not to increase the cost of construction). "Develop the project of anti-terrorist security, which will pay the owners of In housing, the authorities effectively transfer to citizens the costs that logically should be borne by the promoters, "Kalandarov summarizes. – In addition, the law enforcement is after all the duty of the state, and it is completely unclear why the management company or the HOA should be responsible for all activities anti-terrorist. More legal aspect: attics, cellars and other common areas in the MKD is the property of citizens. The establishment of special schemes for the use of these spaces, the imposition of additional services for their protection constitutes a direct violation of property rights. "