[ad_1]
In the United States, a judge made the decision to arrest a suspect for refusing to unblock his iPhone during a police raid, which is now the subject of much debate.
which started as a routine check becomes a real case in the United States. William Montanez will now serve 180 days in jail for refusing to unlock his iPhone at the request of the police.
Everything started June 21, when the police stopped Montanez for a simple infraction of the rules of the road. One of the officers asked the man if he could search the car, but Montanez refused. At that time, the police approached the dogs who immediately started barking. At that time, the inspection of the car revealed a small amount of marujana, a weapon and two iPhone 7 .
On one of the two iPhone was written the message: "OMG, they found it" . The police began to suspect him, and asked permission to control both iPhones. Montanez refused to give his consent and the police then asked for a special warrant from the judge. During the hearing, the judge ruled that the police could unlock the phones without explicit consent, and at that time the prosecution asked defense counsel and the defendant to unlock the two phones brought as evidence . However, Montanez replied that the phones were new and that they did not remember the pbadword. After that answer, the judge sentenced him to 180 days in jail for "civil contempt" .
The defense lawyer then wanted to make a public statement so that all world understands "what can happen to us" . The lawyer said that the police can arrest you for anything and, if they find a phone in your car, they will ask you to unlock it. And if you refuse because personal information is stored there, you risk going to prison.
Of course, the man was sentenced for possession of marujana and a weapon in his car, but for the council legal can not use the pretext of refusing to unlock the iPhone to put an accused in prison.
You like this article! Let it know:
Source link
