[ad_1]
By Louis Colart
A report by the P and R Committees concludes that Benjamin Herman's violent action on May 29 in Liege was unpredictable.
I he went under radar. A report by the P & R Committees, the supervisory bodies of the police and intelligence services, concludes that information held about Benjamin Herman did not predict his pbadage to the terrorist act on May 29 in Liège. The prisoner was on prison leave for 36 hours when he coldly killed two police officers and a student, before being shot in front of a school where he had entrenched himself with a hostage.
This confidential report , that Le Soir was able to consult, concludes that "the information available to the police, intelligence and security services, as well as the Ocam (Coordinating Body for the badysis of the threat), concerning Benjamin Herman, were very limited in number, but also summary and not very alarming ".
What was this information about? 10 documents of various natures quote Benjamin Herman. Among which seven notes of the State Security, which it is important to specify the author of the slaughter of Liege is rarely the main concerned. Like these two notes of August 2017 which simply say that the prisoner of the prison of Marche-en-Famenne participates in collective prayers; or that of February 2017, which evokes for the first time Herman's "radicalization" in contact with another proselyte detainee in Lantin. Three police reports, sometimes old, still include the name of the future terrorist. Again, the author of the attack is not the focus of police attention.
"Poor" news
The Standing Committees P and R therefore consider that "the various services treated the information as it should be" . The information, described as "poor and without real content", was correctly exchanged between all the interlocutors: Ocam, State Security, prisons, police and justice.
If the detainee Herman Benjamin had been planning a terrorist act for a long time on May 29, or even the murder of a former prisoner the day before, as he is suspected, the individual will have been able to hide his intentions. Or fool all the services. "It could not be inferred (information from the police and intelligence, Ed.) that Benjamin Herman fomented extremist-radical or terrorist projects, or constituted a threat of this nature" concludes the report
[ad_2]
Source link
