[ad_1]
This is a new twist in this case for which several thousand lawsuits have been filed against J & J.
According to the lawyer representing the victims, Mark Lanier, a jury composed of six men and six women from a St. Louis, Missouri court decided to sentence the drug group after six weeks of trial and eight hours of deliberations. The damages consist of $ 550 million in compensatory damages and more than $ 4.1 billion in punitive damages.
The plaintiffs claimed that the use of talc for their personal hygiene caused ovarian cancer. [19659002"Formorethan40yearsJohnson&Johnsonhasbeenconcealingevidenceofasbestosinitsproducts"Laniersaidinastatement"WehopethisverdictwilldrawtheattentionofJ&J'sBoardofDirectorsandencouragethemtobetterinformthemedicalcommunityandthepublicofthelinkbetweenasbestostalcandovariancancer"hesaidhecontinuedaskingthepharmaceuticalgrouptowithdrawtheproductsconcernedfromthemarket
In a statement, J & J said it was "deeply disappointed by the verdict."
This "results from an unfair process that saw the plaintiffs represent a group of 22 women, most of whom do not have a Missouri connection but who were all together in one case and all claiming that they have developed ovarian cancer, "said the group.
"The verdict, which awarded the same amount of damages to each of the complainants irrespective of their individual case and legal differences, reflects the fact that the evidence presented in this case could not withstand the prejudices inherent in this case. kind "
J & J reaffirmed that the talc it markets does not contain asbestos and does not cause ovarian cancer, expressing its intention to use" all "
Several trials have already been held for the same reasons and a Court of Appeal of Los Angeles (California) had found in particular last October J & J in rejecting a conviction of 417 million dollars in damages and interests, finding that the complainant's arguments were insufficient and vague.
[ad_2]
Source link
