the investigators "themselves are not satisfied"

The investigators gave, Monday, July 30, a report on the flight MH370 of Malaysia Airlines, mysteriously disappeared four years ago with 239 people on board. According to Florence de Changy, journalist, correspondent in Hong-Kong of RFI and World and author of the book The flight MH370 did not disappear (eds Les Arenes), the investigators "they themselves are not satisfied with this report.They say very clearly that the investigation was unable to establish the true cause of the disappearance of the MH370" .

franceinfo : The report does not provide an answer to the disappearance of the plane, families are disappointed. What do you think about it?

Florence de Changy: There are still some new tracks and some new elements. What could rebadure families, and this is the first thing the chief of the inquiry said at the Kuala Lumpur press conference, is that this final report was not final. It's funny, but it also shows that they themselves are not happy with this report. They say very clearly that "the investigation was unable to establish the true cause of the disappearance of the MH370" .

What are the conclusions of this report?

The report discards the the possibility of a technical problem, he does not support the thesis, which was widely heard in the media, that the captain committed a suicidal act. The pilot is removed from suspicion, as is the technical problem. But there is a new element that is extremely disturbing and interesting: they say that it does not exclude the intervention of a third party, it is a notion that is quite new. They also indicate that there is a very large absence of evidence, which does not allow the official version to be established, nor does it allow it to be rejected. We are in a huge blur. And if we find the wreckage of the plane and the two black boxes, we will find the route of the plane, but that is not what will explain what happened and what was the intention of that. misappropriation which has neither tail nor head

Why are you disputing the official version?

In the official version, the plane turned around and flew over Malaysia. The most basic element that we could be entitled to have and to which obviously the investigators did not have full access, it is the radars of the plane which was seen above Malaysia. I know several people who saw these images and who told me that the plane seen above Malaysia did not correspond to a Boeing 777 at all, it does not have the speed, the altitude or the the capacity and the radar return is much too small compared to the image emitted by a B777. That, the report admits it, but says "actually, it does not correspond to a B777, it is undoubtedly that there is a problem in the radars, one will retain only the position". They therefore make a compromise with reality which is a first step towards recognition that it does not stick, but they do not quite go to the end.