[ad_1]
President Biden insisted he did not have the legal authority to extend a pandemic ban on housing evictions.
And then, under fierce pressure from Nancy Pelosi and the liberal wing of her party, he gave in.
Biden made the very gesture he said, according to most legal experts, “was not likely to pass the constitutional test.”
Now you might expect a flurry of stories accusing the president of defying the courts. But you would be disappointed.
The media are much more interested in the political game surrounding the decision.
WHY THE PRESS WANTS CUOMO, THEIR ONLY BRILLIANT KNIGHT, Resigns
Each president pushes the limits of his authority. Barack Obama granted the Dreamers indefinite asylum. Donald Trump unilaterally transferred funds allocated to other agencies to the Pentagon to build sections of his border wall. Remember the huge outcry among journalists and Democrats over this?
But not for Biden. Now, of course, preventing a few million people from losing their apartments and homes is a laudable goal. The first moratorium was imposed by Trump, and when it expired, the CDC issued a new ban and extended it three times.
But then the Supreme Court said the CDC had exceeded its legal authority. But the court set a one-month deadline for Congress to have time to deal with the issue. The Hill did nothing, the moratorium expired, then Biden did his 180.
Here’s how the Washington Post presented the story:
The House Liberals, backed by their successful campaign for an extended moratorium on deportations, said they plan to continue to pressure the Biden administration to lean to the left while promising to keep party leaders on their promise to move an infrastructure plan only if it is accompanied by trillions of dollars in new welfare spending. “
Now where could we look for a more critical examination of the president bypassing the high court? I know, the Washington Post editorial page:
“The CDC’s action was almost certainly illegal.… Mr. Biden doesn’t get a rule of law pass because his heart is in the right place.”
Politico talks about the upcoming Biden-SCOTUS ‘showdown’, but immediately defaults to politics, saying such a battle could ‘end up fueling the progressive campaign for Supreme Court reform that Biden has been so bad about. lukewarm ”.
NO MORE SHOT-SHAMING: FULL RISE IN VIRUSES FINALLY INCREASED VAX RATES
CNN’s Erin Burnett handled Biden’s overthrow by interviewing a laid-off woman who had fallen behind on her rent and was thrilled with the decision. Burnett then went to see Democratic Representative Cori Bush, who had slept on the Capitol steps for days protesting the expired ban.
“Wow,” Burnett said. “How does it feel to hear that, to hear this news or this moratorium tonight, thanks to you?”
“I am thrilled and overwhelmed,” replied the MP, with “the thought that so many people right now, millions of people, you know, won’t have to take to the streets.”
SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF OF THE HOTTEST STORIES OF THE DAY
When the media supports a political outcome, it focuses on the struggling people who would benefit and doesn’t care about the process. When the media opposes a political outcome – say, the border wall – they focus on the process, not on who might benefit from it.
The process has drawn more attention from the right-wing, like the National Review: “Biden is certainly not the first president to break his oath, but he could be the first in memory to openly brag about it. … Not to take no for an answer – in this case, not to take no for an answer from the Supreme Court – it is anarchy. “
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
A group representing the owners, who are often stuck in the process, has already lodged a complaint.
One more twist: Congress has already allocated states $ 46 billion in rent relief under the pandemic bill. Biden, before switching, said it should be used more. Only $ 3 billion has been spent, in part because of bureaucratic sclerosis.
Biden may have done nothing more than buy some time if the overtime is quickly overturned by justice. Maybe that will catch the media attention late.
[ad_2]
Source link