New Zealand ranks highest in the world for skin cancer



[ad_1]

Experts Call for Mandatory Sunscreen Standards and Total Ban on Tanning Beds After Alarming Figures Show New Zealand Has World's Highest Skin Cancer Rates

Sue Chetwin, chief executive of NZ, said these findings were worrisome, but not surprising given that New Zealand still did not have adequate protection to try to reduce the risk of skin cancer.

"Unfortunately, we have been campaigning for this for a long time and we do not seem to have any influence on the mandatory standards."

Consumer NZ tested last year 20 sunscreens against the Australian and New Zealand standard and only nine responded to their request on the SPF label.

"Our test revealed that some natural sunscreens offered little protection." Chetwin said: [traduction]

She stated that despite the recommendation of # 39, using sunscreen to prevent sunburn, New Zealand has clbadified sunscreen as a cosmetic product

.] "This clearly does not protect consumers from the harmful rays of the sun."

In April, New Zealand's non-melanoma skin cancer rates (basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) reached a record.

Melanoma skin cancer rates set to hit record high, affecting 90,000 people year, up from 67,000 in 2006.

Professor Dietrick Abeck, chief medical advisor at Derma.plus, said that the incidence of both melanoma and skin cancers have increased dramatically over the past decade. "In the world, more than three million non-melanoma skin cancers and 150,000 skin cancers are diagnosed each year, one in three cancers diagnosed is skin cancer," he added. the treatment showed a lower mortality rate, while Sweden, which has the fourth highest rate of melanoma, spent more than any of the 62 countries examined.

But Chetwin said New Zealand had a long way to go

She said tanning beds were another important risk. Using one before the age of 30 could increase the risk of melanoma by 75 percent.

Like sunscreens, compliance with the tanning bed standard was voluntary

"Current regulations do not provide sufficient protection for consumers. "These measures are already in place in Australia and, with our high rates of skin cancer, it's not enough that our regulations are lagging behind," said Chetwin

                            

. [ad_2]
Source link