[ad_1]
São Paulo – " Everything leads me to believe that there is no longer any reason to believe that I will have justice, because what I see now in the behavior The public opinion of some ministers of the Supreme Court is a mere reproduction of what happened in the first and second instances. "The former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva reiterates what he qualifies as Maneuvers of the Lava Jato Operation Task Force and other areas of justice aimed at keeping him in prison and out of the presidential race. 19659002] Lula's Manifesto, entitled Letter of Defense of Democracy was read by PT National President, Senator Gleisi Hoffmann (PR), at a meeting of members of the Legend in the Chamber of Deputies.
If you do not want him to be president of the republic, Lula adds, "the easiest way to do that is to have the courage to practice democracy and defeat me. at the polls ".
The time has come for all Democrats to defend the democratic state of South Africa
Read the full text of the document: [19659002] The right to repudiate the maneuvers of which I am victim, so that the Constitution takes it and not the devices of those who do not respect it for fear of television news.
The only thing I want is that the Task Force Lava Jato, composed of the Federal Police, the Public Prosecutor, the Moor and the TRF-4, shows the company only one material evidence that I have committed a crime. It is not enough to say the word of conviction or belief of power. If there was impartiality and seriousness in my judgment, the process would not have to be thousands of pages, because it was only to show a document proving that I am the owner of this property in Guarujá.
Based on a lie published by the newspaper O Globo, I attributed the ownership of an apartment to Guarujá, the federal police, reproducing the lie, launched an investigation; the prosecutor, accepting the same lie, made the accusation and, ultimately, still based on the untrue lie, Judge Moro mourned me.
All this leads me to believe that there is no longer any reason to believe that I will have justice, because what I see now, in the public behavior of some ministers of the Supreme Court, is the mere reproduction of what happened in the first and second instance.
First, Minister Fachin removed from the second branch of the Supreme Court the habeas corpus lawsuit that could prevent my arrest and sent him to the plenary session. This maneuver prevented the second clbad, whose majority position against pre-trial detention was already known, from obtaining habeas corpus.
Then, to the precautionary measure in which my defense postulated the suspensive effect of the extraordinary remedy, it was demonstrated in the Plenary judgment, in which four of the five second clbad ministers voted for the granting of order. to free me, the same minister decided to bring the case directly to the second clbad, and the trial was to take place on June 26th. The issue raised in this precautionary measure has never been considered by the Plenary or the Panel, as it is whether the reasons for my appeal are likely to justify the suspension of the effects of the complaint. TRF-4 agreement, so that I can answer freely
However, in light of the lights of Friday, June 22, a few minutes after the publication of TRF-4 decision which dismissed my appeal (which occurred at 7:05 pm), as if she were armed with an arrest, the injunction was given and prevented and the process extinguished, an artifice that, again, prevented my case from occurring. to be judged by the competent judicial body (decision rendered at 19:40)
My defense appealed the decision of TRF-4 and the decision that extinguished the precautionary procedure. Surprisingly, however, the rapporteur referred the judgment of this appeal directly to the plenary. With this maneuver more, the natural body skill that was the judgment of my case was further subtracted. As was demonstrated at the sitting of June 26, during which my precautionary order would be judged, the second chamber firmly believes that it is possible to grant suspensive effect to an extraordinary appeal. filed in a situation similar to mine.
It is necessary to ask why the reporter first referred the injunction trial directly to the second clbad and shortly after The monocratic decisions were used to choose the college which seems momentarily to be more convenient, as there was a compromise with the outcome of the trial. They are conceived as a procedural strategy and not as an instrument of justice. Such behavior, in addition to depriving me of the natural judge's guarantee, is only conceivable for the accusers and defenders, but totally inappropriate for a magistrate whose function requires impartiality and detachment from the political arena. .
favor; I Demand Respect
Throughout my life, and I am already 72 years old, I have believed and preached that sooner or later justice will always prevail for those who are victims of it. 39, irresponsibility of false accusations. Especially in my case, where the false accusations are corroborated only by informants who confessed to stealing, who are sentenced to dozens of years in prison and to a desperate search for the approval of the charges, by which they get the freedom, possession and retention of some of the stolen money. It is dramatic and cruel the doubt between continuing to believe that there may be Justice and the refusal to participate in a farce
] I did not commit any crime, I did not commit any crime. I repeat: I did not commit any crime. So until they present at least some material evidence that blurs my innocence, I am a candidate for the Presidency of the Republic. I challenge my accusers to present this evidence until August 15 of this year, when my candidacy will be registered at the Electoral Tribunal. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
] Curitiba, July 3, 2018
[ad_2]
Source link
