[ad_1]
Former President Lula issued a letter on Tuesday (3) reaffirming his candidacy for the presidency of the Republic in this year's elections and, at the same time, challenging his accusers to present a single element of physical evidence that he committed
In the document, read by the national representative of the PT, Senator Gleise Hoffmann (PR), Lula denounces the "maneuvers" suffered by him in the judiciary and claims not to believe in justice. what is happening leads me to believe that there is no longer any reason to believe that I will have justice because what I see now in the public behavior of some ministers of the Supreme Court, it is the mere reproduction of what happened in the first and second
The former president reaffirms that he has committed no crime and that his candidacy will be registered at the Electoral Tribunal on August 15th.
"If you do not want me to be president, the easiest way to do it is to have the courage to practice democracy and to go to the polls," he said.
Lula was sentenced to 12 years and one month in prison for corruption and money laundering in the case of the triplex in Guarujá (SP) and was imprisoned at the headquarters of the Federal Police in Curibia (PR) during almost three months
"My friends and my friends,
"
Lula continues to direct all the electoral votes to the presidency . The time has come for all Democrats engaged in the defense of the Democratic Rule to repudiate the maneuvers I am victim of, so that the Constitution will prevail, and not those of those who do not respect it for fear of the news. of Television
. The only thing I want is that the Lava Jato working group, made up of the federal police, the prosecution, the Moorish and the TRF-4, shows the company only one proof that I I committed a crime. If there was impartiality and seriousness in my judgment, the process would not have to be thousands of pages, since it was only to show a document proving that I am the owner of the property. such a property in Guarujá.
Based on a lie published by the newspaper O Globo, m attributing the ownership of an apartment to Guarujá, the federal police, reproducing the lie, opened an investigation; the prosecutor, accepting the same lie, made the accusation and, ultimately, still based on the untrue lie, Judge Moro mourned me.
All this leads me to believe that there is no longer any reason to believe that I am going to have justice, because what I see now, in the public behavior of some ministers
First, Minister Fachin removed from the second branch of the Supreme Court the habeas corpus lawsuit that could prevent my arrest and sent him back to the Supreme Court, which simply reproduces what is happening. has pbaded in the first and second instances. Plenary This maneuver prevented the second clbad, whose majority position against pre-trial detention was already known, from obtaining habeas corpus.
Then, to the precautionary measure in which my defense postulated the suspensive effect of the extraordinary appeal, in order to release me, the same Minister decided to bring the case directly before the second clbad and the trial was scheduled for June 26th. The issue raised in this precautionary measure has never been considered by the Plenary or the Panel, as it is whether the reasons for my appeal are likely to justify the suspension of the effects of the complaint. TRF-4 agreement, so that I can answer freely
However, in light of the lights of Friday, June 22, a few minutes after the release of TRF-4 decision which dismissed my appeal (at 7:05 pm), as if (19659002) My defense has appealed the decision of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities that the case has been brought before the Court. TRF-4 and also the decision that extinguished the precautionary process. Surprisingly, however, the rapporteur referred the judgment of this appeal directly to the plenary. With this maneuver more, the natural body skill that was the judgment of my case was further subtracted. As was demonstrated at the sitting of June 26, during which my precautionary order would be judged, the second chamber firmly believes that it is possible to grant suspensive effect to an extraordinary appeal. filed in a situation similar to mine. The maneuvers have reached their goal: my request for freedom has not been judged.
It is necessary to ask: why did the rapporteur first refer the injunction trial directly to the second clbad and then sent to the Plenary?
Monocratic decisions were used to choose the collegiate that seems momentarily more convenient, as if there was a compromise with the outcome of the decision. judgment. They are conceived as a procedural strategy and not as an instrument of justice. Such conduct, in addition to depriving me of the natural judge's guarantee, is only conceivable for the accusers and the defenders, but totally inappropriate for a magistrate whose function requires impartiality and detachment from him. Political arena. I do not ask for favor; I ask respect.
Throughout my life, and already 72 years old, I have believed and preached that sooner or later justice will always prevail for those victims of irresponsible false accusations. Especially in my case, where the false accusations are corroborated only by informants who confessed to stealing, who are sentenced to dozens of years in prison and to a desperate search for the approval of the charges, by which they get the freedom, possession and retention of some of the stolen money. People who would be able to blame their own mother for the benefits.
It is dramatic and cruel the doubt between continuing to believe that there may be Justice and refusal to participate in a joke.
If you do not want me to be president, the easiest way to do it is to have the courage to practice democracy and defeat me in elections.
I did not commit any crime. I repeat: I did not commit any crime. So until they present at least some material evidence that blurs my innocence, I am a candidate for the Presidency of the Republic. I challenge my accusers to present this evidence until August 15 of this year, when my candidacy will be registered at the Electoral Tribunal. "
Curitiba, July 3, 2018
Luiz Inácio Lula of Silva
Source link
