[ad_1]
| (photo: AFP)
|
Former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said Tuesday (3) that he will run for president in 2018, at a time when it seems that the PT is already preparing its plan B , with the former mayor of São Paulo, Fernando Hadad, as a candidate.
In a manifesto read by party chairman, Senator Gleisi Hoffmann (PR), at the PT National Executive meeting in Brasília, Lula again stated that it was unfair and without proof and that he will be candidate on August 15th.
"I have not committed any crime, I repeat: I have not committed any crime, so until they present at least material evidence that blurs my innocence , I am a candidate to the President of the Republic, I challenge my accusers of the month of August this year, when my candidacy will be registered at the Electoral Tribunal, "says the PT in the last paragraph of the text (read more) He claimed that he had not obtained any evidence against him and sent his artillery back to the Federal Supreme Court, criticizing the recent decisions of Minister Edson Fachin that made it impossible to hear a case. appeal by the second clbad of the Court
a series of other questions on the work of justice to conclude: "If you do not want me to be president, the simplest way to to achieve is to have the courage to practice democracy and to give myself
The time is I have come for all Democrats engaged in the defense of the Democratic State to repudiate the maneuvers of which I am a victim, so that the Constitution prevails, and not the artifices of those who do not respect it for fear Television news.
The only thing I want, is that the Task Force of Lava Jet by the Federal Police, by the Public Prosecutor, by the Moor and by TRF-4, show the company only one material evidence that I have committed a crime. It is not enough to say the word of conviction or belief of power. If there was impartiality and seriousness in my judgment, the process should not have thousands of pages, since it was only to show a document proving that I am the owner of this property in Guarujá.
Based on a lie published by the newspaper O Globo, m attributing the ownership of an apartment in Guarujá, the federal police, reproducing the lie, began an investigation; the prosecutor, accepting the same lie, made the accusation and, ultimately, still based on the untrue lie, Judge Moro mourned me.
All this leads me to believe that there is no longer any reason to believe that I will have justice, because what I see now, in the public behavior of some ministers of the Court supreme, is the mere reproduction of what happened in the first and second cases.
First, Minister Fachin withdrew from the second panel of the Supreme Court the habeas corpus lawsuit that could prevent my arrest and sent him back to the plenary. This maneuver prevented the second clbad, whose majority position against pre-trial detention was already known, from obtaining habeas corpus.
Then, to the precautionary measure in which my defense postulated the suspensive effect of the extraordinary appeal, in order to release me, the same Minister decided to bring the case directly before the second clbad and the trial was scheduled for June 26th. The issue raised in this precautionary measure has never been considered by the Plenary or the Panel, as it is whether the reasons for my appeal are likely to justify the suspension of the effects of the complaint. TRF-4 agreement, so that I can answer freely
However, in the wake of the lights of Friday, June 22, a few minutes after the publication of TRF-4 decision that dismissed my appeal (occurred at 19:05), as if a precautionary measure was taken, and the process was extinguished, an artifice which, once again, prevented my case from being judged by the competent judicial organ (decision rendered at 19:40).
My defense appealed the decision of TRF-4 and the decision that extinguished the precautionary procedure. Surprisingly, however, the rapporteur referred the judgment of this appeal directly to the plenary. With this maneuver more, the natural body skill that was the judgment of my case was further subtracted. As was demonstrated at the sitting of June 26, during which my precautionary order would be judged, the second chamber firmly believes that it is possible to grant suspensive effect to an extraordinary appeal. filed in a situation similar to mine. The maneuvers have reached their goal: my request for freedom has not been attempted.
It is necessary to ask why the rapporteur first referred the trial of the precautionary measure directly to the second panel, then sent to the Plenum the judgment of the regimental aggravation which, according to the law , should be evaluated by the same panel
Monocratic decisions were used to choose the collegiate that seems momentarily more convenient, as there was a compromise with the outcome of the trial. They are conceived as a procedural strategy and not as an instrument of justice. Such conduct, in addition to depriving me of the natural judge's guarantee, is conceivable only for the accusers and defenders, but totally inappropriate for a magistrate whose function requires impartiality and detachment from the political arena. .
I do not ask for favor; I ask respect.
Throughout my life, and I have said 72 years, I have believed and preached that sooner or later justice will always prevail for those victims of the irresponsible false accusations . Especially in my case, where the false accusations are corroborated only by informants who confessed to stealing, who are sentenced to dozens of years in prison and to a desperate search for the approval of the charges, by which they get the freedom, possession and retention of some of the stolen money. People who would be able to blame their own mother for the benefits.
It is dramatic and cruel the doubt between continuing to believe that there may be Justice and refusal to participate in a farce.
If you do not want me to be president, the easiest way to do it is to have the courage to practice democracy and to fight at the polls.
I did not commit any crime. I repeat: I did not commit any crime. So until they present at least some material evidence that blurs my innocence, I am a candidate for the Presidency of the Republic. I challenge my accusers to present this evidence until August 15 of this year, when my candidacy will be registered at the Electoral Tribunal.
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
Curitiba, July 3, 2018
function (d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0];
if (d.getElementById (id)) returns;
js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id;
js.src = & # 39; https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.12' ;;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs);
} (document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
[ad_2]
Source link
