[ad_1]
Moscow plans to develop an earthly version of missiles used by its navy after the US and Russia leave the INF Treaty on Intermediate Range Missile Systems by 2021.
The Minister Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said on Tuesday that the country would develop the terrestrial variant of the Kalibr cruise missile and a medium-range hypersonic missile in response to the US decision.
ordered the start of the work. Shoigu said that the United States was already "actively" working to develop a land-based missile with a range greater than 500 km. This is why Russia must take equivalent measures. According to him, the long-range Kalibr missile system was very effective in Syria.
Russia used Kalibr missiles for the first time in 2015 as part of operations against Syrian rebels and jihadists. A total of 26 missiles were launched from a ship in the Caspian Sea, 1,500 km from the impact zone.
Shoigu pointed out that the fact that they already exist in their maritime and air versions will reduce the time and cost of manufacturing land-based missiles. The minister proposed the manufacture of new missiles last Saturday to President Vladimir Putin, who announced the departure of Moscow from the INF Treaty signed by the United States and then the Soviet Union in 1987.
The INF Treaty is not intended that with the suspension of the treaty, the United States and Russia can now develop missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 km and launched from land bases, until then prohibited by law. agreement. Both countries accuse each other of having raped her.
Putin said on Saturday that he would not be stationing land-based missiles in Europe or in other parts of the world, unless the United States does the same before. In theory, the treaty can still be saved since it provides that the withdrawal will be communicated six months in advance, during which period it will remain in force.
But experts doubt that until then, the United States and Russia are right. Many experts also argue that the US no longer has an interest in INF because it does not include China, which has developed missile systems banned by the agreement in recent years.
According to all available information, the United States is right: with its missiles 9M729, Russia is violating the Nuclear Forces Treaty within reach intermediate (INF). According to information from DW, several Western intelligence services confirm it despite everything. So, why hang on to a pact that is no longer respected?
The tightrope in which the world balances, no later than since the election of Donald Trump to the US presidency, loses an important safety net. The United States is abandoning the INF Treaty without a realistic prospect of a substitution agreement.
Russians and Americans repeatedly hear that this measure actually addresses the Chinese. In reality, they are fundamentally dissociated from disarmament treaties or other restraint agreements and arm themselves on a large scale. This is a problem especially for Russia. From Moscow's point of view, medium-range land-based missiles are needed to extend the threat potential to the East.
In the same way, there is little to notice from the military point of view. The United States itself notes with increasing concern China's spending on arms and military forces. But do it, please, how can the abandonment of one of the last major nuclear weapons agreements rightfully improve the situation? Americans do the same thing as the Russians: they play with the sinking of the end of the world.
Everywhere, climate change is now being invoked as a fatal blow to humanity. Maybe so, but a new uncontrolled arms race between Russia and the United States, coupled with China as a new world military power, makes the future even darker.
All of us, but especially the Europeans, a potential battlefield of the superpowers, were fortunate at the time of the Cold War that tension did not lead to a nuclear war. During the Cuban crisis of 1962, it almost happened. The political protagonists of the time, including John F. Kennedy and Nikita Krushov, were able to avoid this scary scenario.
It is now even harder to find politicians in this cautious and prudent old school. nuclear weapons. Fortunately, until recently, Trump had largely remained outside of military affairs and had been urging NATO to secure money and contributions from alliance partners.
Russian President Vladimir Putin prefers to play with fire to the west of his gigantic empire. For, though convincing as to be the argument of the Chinese threat, the Chinese threat argument is compelling, it does not justify it brandishing its medium-range missiles at Europeans. Therefore, not only the European Union, but also the rest of the world, will soon have the INF Treaty.
Major nuclear restraint and disarmament instruments, only the new START agreement, which will come into effect in 2020, remain. at the latest, we will have exactly the opposite of what the planet needs, which would constitute a global global agreement on the control of nuclear weapons.
The long-term prospects are no longer good, especially given the many countries. who also cultivate nuclear ambitions. In this way, the current superpower politicians will bequeath to future generations a truly frightening world.
It is true that many Europeans do not feel threatened, and most do not even know what a war looks like. In itself, it is a fantastic thing, but the chances of staying it have further worsened after the US withdrawal from the INF treaty.
Humans have short memories, and this also applies to nations and their presidents. Russia and the United States must be aware as soon as possible of the gravity of the ravages caused by the forces with which they play.
[ad_2]
Source link
