[ad_1]
In a new interview with GLOBO, Vice President Mourão made new polemical statements going against most of Jair Bolsonaro's candidacy. The theme that attracted the most attention – and the revolt – was that of abortion, highlighted by the newspaper in its title. For the general, it would be a matter of choosing the woman, that is to say hell on the baby's right to life in the womb. Here is the extract:
How do you see the situation of Minister Damares after the report of the time?
I do not have any items because I have not read the report. Minister Damares has made an excellent impression because she is a woman with well-defined and firm positions, she does not panic for things. So, this issue of adoption in the indigenous region always has noises. If the girl is satisfied, if the girl is satisfied, I think it is the most important.
How do you think gender issues should be dealt with in government? to have to deal objectively. It is a public health issue. Sexually transmitted diseases are a public health problem. The issue of abortion is also a topic to be discussed because there is an abortion in which the person has been raped or the person can not keep the child. Then the woman should perhaps have the freedom to come and say, "I need an abortion".
Even in cases where the woman is not able to support her child? This is not a member of the government, but is it a personal decision?
Do you think these abortion opportunities could be extended?
Personally, I think so. has made constant and growing cuddles to the "progressives" and seems to have appreciated the "moderate" image that even leftist opponents have decided to give it – a tactical and hypocritical stance, as I have already said. For the elite, "abortion" may be a simple choice for women, but for the vast majority of the Brazilian population, this is not the case. After all, it's another life at stake, not an extension of the woman's body, nor a parasite that can be eliminated without a word.
The "progressive" Democrats of the United States are more and more radical. on the issue of abortion, and those who are more moderate have warned of the loss of voters because of this position. In Virginia, a Democratic Party policy has even proposed a bill to allow abortion in all circumstances by the end of the third quarter! That's right: about to leave the badl cbad, the mother could just kill the baby trained. The governor, also a Democrat, endorsed the speech of the party mate.
It's just monstrous! But that shows the democrat's point of view on the subject. It's as if, through the bad, the baby was gaining life and human status, and only there. Before, you can do what you want. In fact, some already speak even of infanticide, in "postpartum abortion". It is the native barbarism back to civilization, by the pain of the "anointed ones" who consider themselves more enlightened and humanitarian than the "alienated" conservatives, those backward beings who still follow a religious and Christian morality. L & # 39; horror! The triviality!
The trivialization of human life has been on the agenda of the left for some time now, and it has progressively made it monstrous yesterday to be acceptable today. Tomorrow and the inevitable tomorrow. This is why war is cultural. And Mourão's speech is simply pitiful. It may have earned him "progressives" and praise from the press, but it provoked a riot in the government's support base, and rightly so. Mourão has spoken too much. I should remember that the one who makes it ends up giving a good day to the horse …
Rodrigo Constantino
[ad_2]
Source link
