[ad_1]
The performance issues of the new MacBook Pro are gradually turning into a new technological epic. According to a note released by Intel in 2015, the scenario in which a specific device exhibits performance at odds with the value stamped on the processor would be predicted.
As stated in the ExtremeTech website, which has uncovered the note, it is a choice of the manufacturer himself: sacrificing performance for design, or vice versa. In the case of MacBook Pro Core i9, therefore, the poor performance would be the price to pay for a thinner design.
A very high price, true, considering that in several tests the Core i9 8950K present in the new Apple laptop could not reach the minimum nominal value of 2.9 GHz, operating only 2.2 GHz due to cooling problems. The performance only changed when this site decided to put the computer in a freezer – proving that the problem is really in the architecture, which makes heat dissipation difficult.
And this freedom formalized by Intel also works in reverse. After all, it is also possible for a manufacturer to specify a higher surface temperature, which would be the price of a more robust operating device – even if, ultimately, two models with the same CPU have speeds different treatment.
Although the aforementioned text of Intel leaves manufacturers responsible for deciding how much performance will be sacrificed (or not) by a design It seems difficult to extend this condescension to extreme cases like those of the MacBook Pro 2018.
As Joel Hruska has said in his text to ExtremTech, "there is a big difference between limiting turbo capabilities [para programas mais pesados] and performing below chip speed."
manufacturers should anticipate typical uses
Hruska also refutes the notion that OEMs would not be able to predict typical uses of their users. "Forget the idea that Apple, Dell, HP or any other original manufacturer could not predict the type of work your customers would impose – most of them know exactly what their users will need to operate, that there is not so many high-end applications at the head of the market. "
In other words, manufacturers could predict with reasonable accuracy what would be the "firepower" of their models – especially the more expensive ones. "[Basta] defines a number of software that use common applications;
In any case, the fact is that the new MacBook Pro was up to 11% lower than the 2017 model. Something of hardly acceptable for a laptop that can reach $ 7,799 (about $ 10,500) A similar discrepancy has also been observed by several websites that have performed tests with the Core i7 model – even though the decline in performance in this case was
• Also read: The problem of performance of the MacBook Pro 2018 was already a bug with the solution
Source: ExtremeTech
[ad_2]
Source link
