[ad_1]
Other people’s homes are not hotels.
While most brides dream of getting married in the perfect location, these locations are not always available. Unfortunately, as an uncle has just found out, that doesn’t mean the bride-to-be will accept this.
A southern European homeowner says his niece is asking to use a house he owns for her wedding and to force his own family out of the house.
(iStock)
Posting as EurCas-ThAw, a seemingly frustrated owner shared his story on the Reddit forums. According to him, he and his wife bought an old farm in southern Europe 28 years ago. Since then, the house has been nicknamed “the castle” by his family because of a small turret on the property.
After spending years preparing it for their retirement, “the castle” has apparently become a very picturesque place, which has not gone unnoticed by the owner’s family.
BRIDE SENDING ANGRY EMAIL TO COMPANY AFTER THE WEDDING DRESS ARRIVED INCORRECT, REALIZING SHE PUT IT INSIDE
“Recently my niece got engaged and threw an engagement party on Zoom this weekend,” the owner wrote. “When asked what ideas they had had so far, she enthusiastically told me that they actually intended to ask us if they could organize the wedding at the Chateau.
The story continued: “I was a little taken aback but I didn’t want to refuse outright. I joked that it would be a rather small wedding as they would struggle to accommodate more than 25 people in the gardens. She gushed that she had already thought about it and that they had set up awnings in the field nearby (we don’t own this land) and if all the clients were staying in hotels in town, she would arrange transportation for ‘ we all go to the villa. “
FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK FOR MORE FOX LIFESTYLE NEWS
While the owners weren’t thrilled with the idea, they weren’t thrilled to hear the next part of the bride-to-be’s plan. He wrote: “She plans to use the master bedroom as a bridal suite and for the wedding party to have the remaining rooms. My wife, children and I had to stay elsewhere.
Not surprisingly, this was a deciding factor. Apparently, however, it didn’t go well with the bride-to-be or her mother (the owner’s sister). When the owners refused to allow the wedding on their property, “the future bride and my sister exploded, telling me that I was spoiling her marriage and that she had always dreamed of getting married at the Château. My sister even said that since I have used my inheritance it is “family property” which is obviously ridiculous.
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER
Reddit users seemed to agree that it was not unreasonable for homeowners not to let someone take possession of their home for a wedding.
“Wait, are there some people who believe that because you bought something with inheritance money, it’s family property?” a user interviewed. “I hope mom then shares everything she’s done with the inheritance.”
Another user added: “Anytime someone uses coercion to try to get you to do them a favor, you must decline.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“I’m sure there are other properties that they could use that are in the business,” reads another comment, “but then it wouldn’t be free.”
[ad_2]
Source link