[ad_1]
Jamie Spears says Britney Spears’ personal curator Jodi Montgomery told her her daughter was “mentally ill” and wanted to place her in mental custody 5150.
Now in a statement obtained by Variety, Montgomery rejects Mr. Spears’ claims – and, once again, asks him to step down from his daughter’s guardianship.
“Ms. Montgomery implores Mr. Spears to stop the attacks,” Montgomery’s statement read in part. “It doesn’t help; it only hurts. We all need to focus on one thing, and only one: the health, well-being and best interests of Britney Spears. ”
Spears’ father is the curator of his estate, handling all financial decisions, while Montgomery is the singer’s curator of himself, handling all personal and medical decisions.
In new court documents, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court Friday morning, Spears’ father alleged that Montgomery called him last month to tell him she was concerned about his behavior and mental health. daughter and thought she might need to be placed under 5150 psychiatric detention.
“On July 9, 2021, I received a phone call from Ms. Montgomery,” Mr. Spears said in the documents. “During our call, Ms. Montgomery seemed very distraught and expressed how concerned she was about my daughter’s recent behavior and her overall mental health. Ms. Montgomery explained that my daughter was not taking her medication on time or correctly, was not listening to the recommendations of her medical team, and even refused to see some of her doctors.
Spears’ dad says Montgomery asked for her help with these issues because she was “very worried” about “where my daughter was heading.”
In response, Montgomery attorney Laurieann Wright said Variety: “Ms. Montgomery is concerned about Ms. Spears ” recent behavior and overall mental health ‘, as stated in Jamie Spears’ statement dated August 6, 2021. Due to medical confidentiality, Ms. Montgomery cannot enter these concerns in more detail except to say that her father, Jamie Spears, continues to be her curator instead of a neutral professional trustee has a serious impact on Ms Spears’ mental health.
“Notably, Jamie Spears has yet to resign as Ms. Spears’ Curator, which is why Ms. Montgomery continues to serve as Temporary Personal Curator,” the statement continued. “It is in Ms. Spears ‘best interests that her father step down as Curator, so that he can become Ms. Spears’ father again and work on a healthy and supportive father-daughter relationship.”
Montgomery denies Mr Spears’ claim that she suggested the singer be placed in psychiatric detention.
“Sir. Spears’ statement misrepresents what Ms. Montgomery told her regarding a potential psychiatric expectation of 5150 for Ms. Spears,” the statement read. “At no point did Ms. Montgomery tell Mr. Spears that Ms Spears would currently be eligible for such a hold. The concern Ms Montgomery raised with Mr Spears during their phone call is that forcing Ms Spears to testify or have her assessed would only move the needle in the wrong direction. for his sanity.
Spears’ father also alleges that Montgomery admitted that “many of my daughter’s statements at the last hearing were not true and attributed her statements to my daughter being ‘mentally ill’.”
The hearing Spears’ father is referring to is when the superstar told the judge in mid-July that she wanted to “press charges” for “abuse of conservation.” She alleged that she was controlled by her father to the point of not being able to choose what to drink, not being able to drive a car with her boyfriend, and not being allowed to have another child or to have sex. marry, because she says her conservatives will not allow her to remove her IUD. (In the past, lawyers for Mr. Spears have denied any wrongdoing.)
Spears’ father says his “only motivation has been his unconditional love for his daughter and a fierce desire to protect her from those who try to take advantage of her.”
Although Spears’ father has said he is working in his daughter’s best interests, Montgomery seems to be okay with the pop star, who told Judge Brenda Penny earlier this summer that she wanted to keep Montgomery on her job. case and wanted his father removed and put in jail. Ms Spears said she wanted Montgomery to help her readjust to the real world, and Montgomery said she was working on the end goal of getting Spears out of her tutelage.
Lawyers for Spears’ father continue to claim his innocence and point fingers at Montgomery. Elder Spears had used this tactic before, and Friday’s filing indicates a continuation of that same strategy. Following his daughter’s first explosive testimony in court on June 23, where she first broke her silence with scathing accusations against her father, he said he had nothing to do with personal decisions or medical, which he believes fall within Montgomery’s purview.
Today, Spears’ father says Montgomery, along with his daughter’s former court-appointed lawyer Samuel D. Ingham, who has since resigned, was the one who admitted the pop star to an establishment in early 2019. and “has continued to have control over my daughter’s medical treatment and personal life ever since.
Montgomery strongly denies the accusation, his lawyer telling Variety that she did not admit her to any establishment and that she would not even have the power to make such a decision.
“As case manager, Ms. Montgomery worked under the exclusive direction and control of Jamie Spears,” Montgomery’s attorney said in a statement. “She had neither the power nor the authority to place Britney Spears in an institution as a case manager – only Jamie Spears had that power in March 2019.”
The statement continued: “It is unequivocally not true that it was Ms Montgomery and Sam Ingham ‘who admitted Ms Spears to a facility in early 2019.“ In fact, that would have been impossible. Neither would a case manager. nor a court-appointed lawyer could have had this power, whether working alone or together. Only the person’s Registrar would have had this power (with the Registrar’s consent) – and, again, it was Jamie Spears in March 2019. ”
Montgomery’s attorney said that while she may have signed “routine documents” for the establishment, she only did so “on the direction of Jamie Spears.” She says the decision to place the singer in an institution in March 2019 was made by the singer’s attending psychiatrist at the time, Dr. Timothy Benson.
Montgomery also appeared to align with the interests of Spears’ new attorney, Mathew Rosengart. In a recent filing, Montgomery agreed with Rosengart that he wanted to remove Mr Spears from guardianship, and also claimed that Spears’ own doctors were okay with him being removed from his post. (Rosengart is currently working on the dismissal and suspension of Spears’ father, having filed documents a few weeks after he started working with the singer.)
In the new documents, filed by Spears’ father on Friday, he also targets his daughter’s lawyer and opposes moving the hearing on the motion to remove him from guardianship. Yesterday Rosengart asked to speed up the hearing, saying it would be in the best interests of the curator. (For now, the hearing is set for September 29.)
“A guardianship should be a last resort, designed to benefit the attorney rather than a mechanism designed to serve as a tool for third party enrichment,” Rosengart’s latest case said, once again, alleging that the father de Spears wasted his multi-million fortune. Yesterday’s documents read: “Mr. Spears also got rich at his daughter’s expense, reaping millions of dollars from his services as an interpreter, in addition to paying himself $ 16,000 a month from the estate of Mrs. Spears, $ 2,000 more than he allocated to Mrs. Spears, plus $ 2,000 per month for office expenses.
Yesterday, Rosengart’s file included an allegation that Elder Spears objected to his daughter going on vacation to Maui, Hawaii. In today’s case, Mr. Spears retaliates, saying Rosengart made “vague and unfounded accusations” and a “false statement” about the trip to Hawaii.
Rosengart says Spears’ father has exercised “absolutely microscopic control” over his life since he was a child, and continues to do so today, as the curator of his estate. As an example, Rosengart claims that Spears’ father objected to his 39-year-old daughter taking a vacation to Maui last summer, but “finally gave in.”
“Mr. Spears objected to his daughter’s wish in late July for a short vacation, disapproving of the expense that would have come from his daughter’s hard-earned money,” the Rosengart dossier said yesterday. having her adult daughter take a well-deserved short vacation at this point in her life, when other funds are being spent lavishly, underlines why the suspension, and ultimately the dismissal, should not wait. “
Variety contacted Rosengart for comment regarding Mr. Spears’ new case.
[ad_2]
Source link