[ad_1]
Since 2008, after a series of public collapses, Spears has lived under a single guardianship, sometimes known as guardianship, a complex legal arrangement usually reserved for the elderly, sick or infirm. For more than a decade, the pop singer quietly followed the installation, which controlled her finances, as well as aspects of her daily life, like her mental health care, and where and how she could travel.
Spears, 38, who hasn’t released an album since 2016 and has slowed down considerably since his heyday in the early 2000s, announced an ‘indefinite work interruption’ in January 2019, citing health issues at the time from his father, who had suffered a ruptured colon. . But in August, she moved for the first time to make substantial changes to guardianship in court “to reflect major changes in her current lifestyle and stated wishes,” according to her lawyer. She also kept open the possibility that she would seek to get rid of the arrangement altogether.
Representatives for Jamie Spears said her management of her career had protected her from financial ruin, turning her estate into a nearly $ 60 million business and likely saving her life. In court records, Jamie said his “only motivation was his unconditional love for his daughter and his staunch desire to protect her from those who try to take advantage of her.
Jamie Spears’ attorney Vivian Lee Thoreen said in court on Wednesday that Ingham’s comments about the father-daughter relationship were hearsay only and should not be admissible.
The complicated family and financial drama has been the continued presence of a particularly vocal militant wing of fans calling themselves the #FreeBritney movement, who have sought to present the Guardianship as a money-hungry means of total control over Spears. For years the Spears family largely ignored these accusations, but recently the singer has shown appreciation for their support, which many have seen as implicit encouragement.
[ad_2]
Source link