[ad_1]
The hope is that the unbundling of Google's apps by phones is standardizing the playing field so that competitors can enter the game; or rather their application before new eyeballs. For consumers, this could mean having to look for alternatives because there is no default option. But, according to the argument of the EU, then they could find other products that better meet their needs.
Loading
This idea, however, threatens the very foundation of Android. At present, Google's Android software is "open" or available for free for manufacturers. At this price, it is obviously cheaper for companies to choose Android than to develop their own system. Google benefits from these partnerships because its products, such as research, are embedded in the software and used by millions of people.
The opening of its platform to manufacturers such as Samsung, Huawei and others gave Android a run ahead of the operating system run. Apart from Apple, no company has been able to develop an alternative to Android that competes with this dominance. According to StatCounter, a website badytics company, Android is used by nearly 80% of mobile phone users.
Google should change a lot if it adopts a strategy, for example, closer to Apple – which has a closed operating system – said Larry Downes, project director at the Business Center and Georgetown Public Policy. If she adopted this model, she would have to sell the Android operating system to the smartphone manufacturers right from the start. This cost would probably be pbaded on to all consumers, he says.
"If they can not count on that as a source of money, they will have to bill Android and all the software that Google manufactures" says
Washington Post
Source link
