[ad_1]
Angel Djambazki was surprised with a "Makarov" pistol in his jacket at the Sofia airport Wednesday, November 21 before noon. He went to Brussels. The airport guards discovered the weapon. There was a procedure to temporarily remove the gun. Here is the story of Angel Djambazki before Dir.bg:
"I own a Macarov personal self-defense weapon, which is not an offensive weapon – a 9×18 caliber, eight rounds, and Sunday night two weeks ago, I took it because I was Had a reason – I had provocative information while we went very early at night at home and, this morning, I went to see colleagues on an early morning TV channel and I went to the airport, "said Dzhambazki.
He also commented: "When you carry a weapon openly, it causes aggression, I put it in a bag, because I do not usually take it with me." Border police officers came and went said: "Excuse me, Mr. Djambazki, but you have a bag of weapons" and you can not get some, of course, I replied: "Say what is the order . I did not warn anyone. We signed a protocol, presented an identity card, presented a valid weapons license. They checked with the Ministry of the Interior whether the permit and the document numbers were valid. I have left the storage and custody gun responsible with a voluntary protocol for its transmission to the border police. The next day, when I came back, I picked it up. No citizen saw the weapon, it was not shown in the lounge where there were at least 300 pbadengers. If there was a scandal, they would shoot. But there was no scandal, "said Djambazki.
"The reason I did not want to comment was that the border police officers were extremely competent and well-intentioned and they applied the protocol, they are professionals and they proved that the Bulgaria was maintaining its air border.It was also my interest.they were sleeping, I should go to Frankfurt airport without even imagining what I was carrying in my luggage, and there would be a coupon that I would not believe "Did you imagine that I had made this bag" negligence, my mistake, "admitted Djambazki.
He denied having a cartridge in the barrel, as some media have written. They are phantasmagoria. "The weapon has rules on which it is carried, and allegations that there was a scandal with the citizens are also false, and another story, dishonest and abominable, continues a week ago in case of scandal, it would spread instantly – an unavoidable person would take a picture of a phone and he would say that he was carrying guns, guns, gauntlets, grenades, but that did not happen. is not produced – how did this information arrive in two weeks on the eve of a press conference on the internal order of involvement Nick Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior. And those who go, if you were really honest journalists could call me on the phone, "protested against Djambazki.
Earlier in the day, the case had also been commented by the Minister of Defense, VMRO Krbadimir Karakachanov, who had described him as mundane. He confirmed that Djambazki had forgotten to remove his personal weapon from the bag.
A trivial affair in which a business traveler in his personal travel bag forgot to remove his legally owned personal weapon. Thus, Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Krbadimir Karakachanov commented on the event with MEP Angel Djambazki.
"No, I would say that there is something very long or spice to discuss," said Deputy Prime Minister.
As a rule, the transfer of weapons to luggage is not forbidden. However, the wearing of any type of firearm must be reported to the carrier in advance and when checking in for a flight at the airport.
Yordan Michev, deputy editor of the Duma newspaper, wrote yesterday that the IMRO MEP, Angel Djambazki, had been surprised with a loaded pistol "Makarov" at Sofia Airport last Wednesday before noon. According to the publication, the MEP was carrying a "Makarov" loaded with eight rounds and one in the barrel. At the time of the confiscation, Djambazki began to argue with his scrutineers, writes the newspaper that describes the quarrels. There was also a protocol for the capture of the firearm for security measures. Some of today 's information has been refused by the first person.
[ad_2]
Source link
