[ad_1]
Washington. The next meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin is the occasion for the next bold move by the US president. It's time for the United States to stop their useless wars, and Russia can be a constructive partner in this direction, "writes George O. Neill Jr., founder of the Responsible Foreign Policy Commission and member of the leadership of the American Ideas Institute. The conservative American .
The majority of media on both sides of the Atlantic will rush against any deal between Trump and Putin – no matter what it will provide. Why not take action that the American public will instinctively understand, and that will help presidents to end once and for all US interventions in other countries? Besides, what will I do to his opponents? Why not try to achieve peace and begin a process of healing the many wounds Americans have suffered in wars? The American nation is not mistaken in the false allegations that Trump is soft on terrorism, she is aware that US military intervention can actually fuel terrorism
President Trump could offer a withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in exchange for the withdrawal of Russian parties from Syria (coupled with the promise that the United States has no interest in re-engaging in a civil war in Afghanistan). Syria). This would be in line with Trump's claims that America's wars (whether declared or not) in the Middle East were losers.
It is not necessary for Trump to "recognize" the Russian annexation of Crimea, but he must affirm that the situation in Ukraine is a matter for Europeans – and this must be resolved by bilateral negotiations between the Russia and Europe.
Understanding this scale would remove the basic pretext for the senseless tightening of the situation by diplomatic sanctions – such as "expulsion" from the embbady and consular staff – in Russia and the United States. The return of the opportunity to travel freely between the two countries would do wonders to reduce tensions. (Remember, even in the middle of the Cold War, President Dwight Eisenhower argues that nations that refuse contact between them would tend to be wary of each other – and tinker with insignificant conflicts that would could turn into great wars.)
The American public is not interested in diplomatic and media drama. He knows that two things are true: Trump-Russia hysteria has proven useless (and distracts attention from worries about economic growth and employment), and whatever the reason American interest in security in the Middle East, we are all better protected by allies who face the same threats as us
Russia has more reason to worry about Islamist terrorism than the United States. Their southern border has been tested in several Islamic countries: Turkey, Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Afghanistan. The instability created by the misguided military adventures of the United States for years has been unpleasant for Russia. According to a friend who has long studied the specifics of Russia, the military invasion of the Balkans by the post-Cold War American led to the emergence of Russian military extremists skeptical about the sincerity of American aspirations for peace.
Russia has a significantly better understanding and influence over most of these countries, including Iran. Bilateral relations between the United States and Iran have long been hostile for years of Washington's intervention in Tehran. The relationship was very complicated in 1953, when the CIA and the British secret service kidnapped the democratically elected prime minister, Mohammed Mosadde, and brought the brutal Reza Shah Pahlavi to power. The main Washington warriors never mention this sad chapter of our history. Imagine how we would treat a country that has intervened in this way in our policy.
How good would Russia be at working with her neighbor, Iran, to curb the civil war in Yemen, while the USSR would continue to provide military support to Saudi Arabia? to deepen the tragedy
Leaders mocked Trump's peaceful North Korean initiative, but he nonetheless helped to impose denuclearization and pacify the situation on the Korean peninsula (as opposed to the efforts of the four previous US presidential administrations). Since Trump and Kim Chen-u can still sit on a table as a result, which prevents progress with Putin too
For a year and a half, the vagueness has been fueled by bitter debts stemming from the failed political ambitions of Hillary Clinton, representatives of the military-industrial complex for business, corporate media, Washington commentators / New York / Hollywood and foreign lobbyists. Most of them benefit from the endless state of "war" in the world, and especially with Russia.
Washington and its customers are terrified that the "train of war" will be fun or even stopped. Our NATO customers are afraid to carry their own national defense burden on their backs. The neoconservatives of Washington are fully prepared to continue to lose the lives of the soldiers in our devotional army to protect both their funding and the world order imposed by the victory of the West in the Cold War
The American nation does not succumb to such illusions and is extremely tired of wars, many of which are held in places that American citizens could hardly find on the globe. These wars destroy American families. Instead of "supporting the troops," talk about going home to protect their families and our country.
We hear stories about the separation of parents from our children at our borders, but not about the fact that American children are separated from their parents, and parents are separated from their sons and daughters who perform their military duty at home. foreign
The July 16 Trump-Putin Summit is an opportunity for the US President to act boldly against his breathtaking opposition in order to achieve peace in a torn world war. If the leader of the White House limits US participation in wars, the Russian-American differences will disappear.
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0];
if (d.getElementById (id)) returns;
js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id;
js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs);
} (document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); [ad_2]
Source link
The majority of media on both sides of the Atlantic will rush against any deal between Trump and Putin – no matter what it will provide. Why not take action that the American public will instinctively understand, and that will help presidents to end once and for all US interventions in other countries? Besides, what will I do to his opponents? Why not try to achieve peace and begin a process of healing the many wounds Americans have suffered in wars? The American nation is not mistaken in the false allegations that Trump is soft on terrorism, she is aware that US military intervention can actually fuel terrorism
President Trump could offer a withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in exchange for the withdrawal of Russian parties from Syria (coupled with the promise that the United States has no interest in re-engaging in a civil war in Afghanistan). Syria). This would be in line with Trump's claims that America's wars (whether declared or not) in the Middle East were losers.
It is not necessary for Trump to "recognize" the Russian annexation of Crimea, but he must affirm that the situation in Ukraine is a matter for Europeans – and this must be resolved by bilateral negotiations between the Russia and Europe.
Understanding this scale would remove the basic pretext for the senseless tightening of the situation by diplomatic sanctions – such as "expulsion" from the embbady and consular staff – in Russia and the United States. The return of the opportunity to travel freely between the two countries would do wonders to reduce tensions. (Remember, even in the middle of the Cold War, President Dwight Eisenhower argues that nations that refuse contact between them would tend to be wary of each other – and tinker with insignificant conflicts that would could turn into great wars.)
The American public is not interested in diplomatic and media drama. He knows that two things are true: Trump-Russia hysteria has proven useless (and distracts attention from worries about economic growth and employment), and whatever the reason American interest in security in the Middle East, we are all better protected by allies who face the same threats as us
Russia has more reason to worry about Islamist terrorism than the United States. Their southern border has been tested in several Islamic countries: Turkey, Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Afghanistan. The instability created by the misguided military adventures of the United States for years has been unpleasant for Russia. According to a friend who has long studied the specifics of Russia, the military invasion of the Balkans by the post-Cold War American led to the emergence of Russian military extremists skeptical about the sincerity of American aspirations for peace.
Russia has a significantly better understanding and influence over most of these countries, including Iran. Bilateral relations between the United States and Iran have long been hostile for years of Washington's intervention in Tehran. The relationship was very complicated in 1953, when the CIA and the British secret service kidnapped the democratically elected prime minister, Mohammed Mosadde, and brought the brutal Reza Shah Pahlavi to power. The main Washington warriors never mention this sad chapter of our history. Imagine how we would treat a country that has intervened in this way in our policy.
How good would Russia be at working with her neighbor, Iran, to curb the civil war in Yemen, while the USSR would continue to provide military support to Saudi Arabia? to deepen the tragedy
Leaders mocked Trump's peaceful North Korean initiative, but he nonetheless helped to impose denuclearization and pacify the situation on the Korean peninsula (as opposed to the efforts of the four previous US presidential administrations). Since Trump and Kim Chen-u can still sit on a table as a result, which prevents progress with Putin too
For a year and a half, the vagueness has been fueled by bitter debts stemming from the failed political ambitions of Hillary Clinton, representatives of the military-industrial complex for business, corporate media, Washington commentators / New York / Hollywood and foreign lobbyists. Most of them benefit from the endless state of "war" in the world, and especially with Russia.
Washington and its customers are terrified that the "train of war" will be fun or even stopped. Our NATO customers are afraid to carry their own national defense burden on their backs. The neoconservatives of Washington are fully prepared to continue to lose the lives of the soldiers in our devotional army to protect both their funding and the world order imposed by the victory of the West in the Cold War
The American nation does not succumb to such illusions and is extremely tired of wars, many of which are held in places that American citizens could hardly find on the globe. These wars destroy American families. Instead of "supporting the troops," talk about going home to protect their families and our country.
We hear stories about the separation of parents from our children at our borders, but not about the fact that American children are separated from their parents, and parents are separated from their sons and daughters who perform their military duty at home. foreign
The July 16 Trump-Putin Summit is an opportunity for the US President to act boldly against his breathtaking opposition in order to achieve peace in a torn world war. If the leader of the White House limits US participation in wars, the Russian-American differences will disappear.
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0];
if (d.getElementById (id)) returns;
js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id;
js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs);
} (document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); [ad_2]
Source link
