Henry Cavill explains the controversial death of steel man Zod

If you were to point to a moment that has blurred the DC film universe into controversy from the beginning, even before it's a cinematic universe, this would be the end of 1945-19004 Man of Steel . After the gigantic Battle of Metropolis, which caused damage on a mad scale, Superman was forced to kill General Zod, slamming his neck to save an innocent family from his vision of heat. For the great Blue Scout to take a life this way goes against the spirit of the character for many fans, as Superman is often defined as a hero who does not kill. But for actor Henry Cavill, this act was not a violation of Superman's belief, but the catalyst, as he explained:

As Henry Cavill told Square Mile, he sees the act of killing General Zod in of Steel as the event that cemented the non-murder rule in Superman's mind. This is not an idealistic lesson from his father, but a first-hand experience of what it means to kill someone is the thing that makes him have this rule in the first place. From that moment, by understanding the ramifications, Superman promises to never do it again. It is from here that he has begun the transition to the traditional Superman that never kills and that is a beacon of hope and well that we all know.

This reasoning makes sense in the context of the film. Man of Steel is the original story of Henry Cavill's Superman. This is not a seasoned pro, but someone who learns who he is, what he is capable of, where he comes from and who he is supposed to be. Therefore, it's the first time he's faced with having to kill anyone.

I'm sure Superman's purists can take umbrage with this reasoning and think that Superman's belief in never killing should be innate and part of his education. who is he. It should not be something that he has to experience to make up his mind. But being fiercely against something in the abstract rather than being confronted in a real situation are two completely different things.

We see Superman begging Zod to stop, we see his anguish when he makes the choice and in the wake of that. He's not a cold-blooded killer, but someone who has faced a horrible decision to kill or let innocent people die. There is an argument to make that to be faithful to the character it should not have been put in such a situation in the film or should have found another way, but personally in the context of the scene as it was. she is, I saw her As there is no other option.

I'm sure this will be debated forever but hopefully we'll end up having a Man of Steel 2 to see more of Henry Cavill's Superman and his trip. In the meantime, you can check out our guide for all the latest news from the DC film universe.