[ad_1]
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) – The California Supreme Court has ruled that employers must pay workers for the time they spend performing tasks outside of the clock , like locking after work. , released this week, marks a victory for labor advocates who say that asking hourly workers to spend minutes doing unpaid work is tantamount to a salary theft. A federal law, called the Fair Labor Standards Act, generally allows companies to avoid paying employees for time spent on tasks that the law calls mundane or too difficult to follow.
In its majority opinion, the California Supreme Court stated that the federal rule does not apply to the state with respect to certain duties performed by employees 24 hours a day. [19659002ThisistheresultofasixyearlawbattlebetweenStarbucksandDouglasTroesteraCaliforniaworkerwhosuedthecompanyfornotpayinghimforshutdowndutiesthatheclaimedtookanadditionalfourtotenminuteseachdayafterhisrelease
During the 17 months of employment of Troester at Starbucks, According to court documents, Shaun Setareh, one of the lawyers who represented Troester, said that this amounted to "a theft of pay" .
"It's essentially skimmin. He stated that the decision "changes the game" which "has implications for all employers in the state."
M. Setareh called this decision a "game changer" for the benefit of CEOs and shareholders of large companies. 19659002] Starbucks said in a statement that he was "disappointed" with the decision, referring the case to the US Court of Appeals, at the 9th Circuit.
"We await the decision of the case before the 9th Circuit as appeal The process continues," reads the statement.
The United States Chamber of Commerce, the largest group of The country's business lobby, is standing alongside Starbucks in pursuit of the case. "The organization said in a brief filed with the California Supreme Court that employers in California are "Already vulnerable to court costs following trials without pay and hours."
"The court should not increase this exposure and impractical position," reads the memoir. The Chamber of Commerce has not responded to a request for comment on the decision.
The majority opinion of the California Superior Court suggests that federal law is obsolete, and smartphones or other modern devices can be used to easily track an employee's time.
"As the facts show here, a few extra minutes of work can be added each day," says the Supreme Court of California.
The decision leaves room for interpretation.
"We leave unanswered whether there are any wage claims involving employee activities that are so irregular or so brief that it would not be reasonable to require employers to" 39, they remunerate employees for the time they devote to it "
. TM & 2018 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.
Source link
