[ad_1]
Published
July 13, 2018 17:30:52
A St. Louis jury awarded total damages of over $ 6 billion to 22 women and their families after claiming asbestos in Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder for their cancer. Ovarian, in the first case.
Johnson & Johnson said the verdict was the result of an unfair process
The jury announced the award of $ 5.6 billion ($ 4.14 billion) in punitive damages soon after the award $ 742 million in compensatory damages after six weeks. St. Louis Circuit Court Trial
Johnson & Johnson called the verdict the result of an unfair process that allowed women to sue the company in Missouri, although most of the cases were in the United States. among them do not live in the state.
wo "Johnson & Johnson remains confident that its products do not contain asbestos and do not cause ovarian cancer and intends to pursue all available remedies on appeal", he added. Spokesperson Carol Goodrich
Mark Lanier, the plaintiffs' lead counsel, said in a statement that Johnson & Johnson had concealed evidence of asbestos in its products for more than 40 years.
Medical experts testified during the trial. Asbestos, a known carcinogen, is mixed with mineral talc, which is the main ingredient of Johnson & Johnson's Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products.
Plaintiffs' lawyers stated that asbestos fibers and talc particles were present in ovarian tissues. "We hope this verdict will retain the attention of the J & J Board and will lead them to better inform the medical community and the public about Asb's relationship with women." "The company should remove the talc from the market before causing more anxiety, injury and death due to a terrible illness."
At closing arguments, Mr. Lanier said said: jurors this case was the first where jurors saw documents proving that Johnson & Johnson knew that its products contained asbestos and did not warn consumers, reported The St Louis Post-Dispatch [19659007JohnsonandJohnsonhavealwaysdeniedthathisproductscanbelinkedtocancer
Ms. Goodrich has stated that the verdict granted the same amount to women despite the differences in their situation, the evidence in the case was overwhelmed by the prejudices created when so many plaintiffs are allowed to sue the company in an action in justice.
"Every Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson Before This Jurisdiction" Plaintiffs' lawyers stated that punitive damages are limited by state law to five times the amount of punitive damages. [19659007] Six of the 22 plaintiffs in the last trial died of ovarian cancer.
Five plaintiffs were from Missouri, other states that include Arizona, New York, North Dakota, California, Georgia, the Carolinas and Texas
One of the plaintiffs, Gail Ingham, 73, of O. Fallon, Missouri, said at The Post-Dispatch that she was diagnosed with stage 3 ovarian cancer in 1985 and underwent chemotherapy treatments, surgeries, and drug treatments for one year before being declared without in the early 1990s. Ms. Ingham, who had been using powder for decades, said who use baby powder "need to know what's in it. They need to know what's going on. In 1965, a US jury awarded 100 million US dollars to the family of a woman who died of ovarian cancer and attributed her death to the talcum powder Johnson & Johnson.
But the Cancer Council of Australia warned that women should not be worried about the decision, adding that evidence of a link was "thin at best"
AP / ABC
Topics: ]
ovarian cancer,
courts and trials,
human interest,
United States
Source link
