Las Vegas police block the streets near the Mandalay Bay hotel on October 2, 2017, where residents have deposited balloons and flowers in memory of the victims of A mbad shot . A lawsuit filed by MGM Resorts International, owner of the Las Vegas hotel, of which Stephen Paddock shot dead 58 people and wounded hundreds of others, aroused outrage from survivors of the shooting. more deadly of American history.

The lawsuit against hundreds of victims of the alleged October 1 attack claims that the entertainment giant has "no responsibility".

MGM said in a statement that the filing was intended to provide a "quick resolution" sued or will sue as a result of the attack during the Harvest Road 91 Festival. "The unpredictable events of October 1 affected thousands of people in Las Vegas and throughout North America," MGM Resorts spokeswoman Debra DeShong said in a statement. Since the day of this tragedy, we have focused on the recovery of those who have been affected by the despicable act of an evil individual. "

More: " Las Vegas Shooting 911 Calls Released

For More: Documents Details Terror, Chaos during murderous killings in Las Vegas

Brian Claypool, a survivor of the rampage that represents 75 survivors and family members of the victims, called the MGM trial a "waterfall" that will not survive a court challenge.

"I am still in therapy once a week, and that's their way of trying to solve the problem" … "It's about transferring responsibility and minimizing their negligence blatantly "

Robert Eglet, whose firm represents hundreds of people in the case, dismissed MGM's claim as" scandalous "and accused the company of attempting to intimidate the victims. of his clients have sued here and others will not do it "In my 30 years of practice, it's the most reprehensible behavior I've ever seen." "They are trying to victimize these people twice."

MGM's lawsuit claims the case must be tried by a federal court under the Security Act after September 11, which encourages the development and the deployment of anti-terrorism technologies. . The company claims that the security firm it has concluded for the concert, CSC, has been approved by the Department of Homeland Security and thus released from its liability under the law.

Eglet and Claypool claim that the release does not extend to the hotel. "The Security Act does not apply to them, it applies to the CSC," said Eglet. "MGM has nothing to do with CSC."

Eglet said that there was no reason to clbadify the lawsuit since the question of jurisdiction is already being discussed in court. He says that MGM is "shopping judge".

"They are trying to find a judge they like," he said. "All they've done, is causing a lot of stress, pouring gasoline on the fire."

Carl Tobias, a professor at the Law School of Richmond University in Virginia, says the company could convince a federal judge. his arguments. But he suggests that it would have a price.

"Even though MGM is successful, it may not win out on negative publicity for the company that the combination generates, "he told USA TODAY.

MGM took a hit on social media.

"This is just OUTRAGEOUS & WRONG," tweeted JoAnn Smith, whose profile indicates that she is a security guard in Las Vegas. Crypto Contrarian tweeted that "being a Las Vegan, I have to talk about it, does not MGM see how dangerous it will be?"

Paddock fired over 1,000 rounds of a hotel room overlooking the concert. He was found dead from a self-inflicted bullet wound in the room.

MGM has been a key target in the case. Many lawyers in Las Vegas present filming on their websites, some specifically calling MGM and the promoter of the concert to provide insufficient security.

"A gunman bringing more than two dozen firearms into a hotel room, including military badault weapons, is almost unthinkable," says Ladah Law Firm on his website. Internet. "There are serious questions about security procedures at Mandalay Bay."

The article adds that "if you take out a casino chip from a table, you will no doubt immediately be surrounded by security guards;"

Claypool said that MGM should spend money on 39 Money for security consultants, not lawyers to develop "desperate arguments" to avoid liability

"Securing security would be the socially responsible thing to do," he said. "But instead, they offend every person on the planet with their moral indignity."

Autoplay

View thumbnails

View captions

Last slide

Click here to read or share this story: https://usat.ly/ 2LtccWr

[ad_2]
Source link