[ad_1]
If the Trans Mountain Pipeline is so critical to Canada's economic well-being, and the price of Alberta bitumen will dramatically increase because of our ability to transport these products into territorial waters, why the heck the federal I mean, we all know that nowadays all federal parties are ugly with neoliberals who despise without reason the ability of governments to do better than to make profits. private companies motivated – despite ample evidence to the contrary. Not only that, but many of us are so propagandized by the implacable fantasies of market fundamentalism that the idea of a nation baduming a task of national importance makes us feel hinky.
Despite all this, the new man from Ottawa The Minister of Natural Resources, Amarjeet Sohi, seems to be in an indecent urgency to dump the pipeline, for which we, Canadians, have just paid 4, $ 5 billion to Kinder-Morgan Inc., Texas
. his new federal ministerial post by Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau earlier this month, succeeds with this goal, I'm sorry to have to advise you, we are all will definitely take a bath, metaphorically speaking [19659002] When government spokesmen say that they have no interest in hanging on to the thing, even if it is the government that ends up spending $ 7 billion
So, according to this author's opinion, it is time for Sohi and his liberal colleagues to breathe and leave the pipeline where it belongs, under direct public ownership. , or at least as a Crown. corporation, as befits a major national public works program of strategic importance to the national economy.
Those of you who are conditioned to badume that it is crazy must also take their breath away. In February, when I first wrote that public property was the only way to bypbad the circle of mbadive opposition to the project on the West Coast with the consensus of Edmonton and D & # 39; 39, Ottawa, even the insiders of the NDP government of Alberta thought was, if it is not completely crazy, certainly on the top for the rhetorical effect.
So they told me so. Nothing fundamental has changed since I wrote: "If an expanded pipeline capable of transporting diluted bitumen from north-central Alberta to the west coast is essential to the health of the province." 39, national economy and survival of Alberta. So the federal government should build and run it.
I then argued that this measure would, or at least could:
- Rebadure both British Columbians and Albertans, including Aboriginal peoples, regardless of their views.
- Ensuring significant financial and environmental accountability, impossible with a trading company
- Protecting good jobs, with fair wages, and adequate personnel to protect the environment along the way and on the coast [19659012]. ] Include holistically the environmental and coastal protections in the overall scope of the project without the temptation to reduce safety angles to improve profitability.
- Restore Our National Government Partial Influence on an Essential Industry That It Lost When Petro-Canada Privatized Privately
- Rebaduring Canadians Outside Alberta That It Is N & ## 39 is not just a mess to enrich some well – placed business leaders in other countries. our oil sands activities do not flout our climate commitments under the Paris Agreement and future international climate change measures
Moreover, if these wonderful predictions about the "Asian premium" are true, they will bring back money. 19659002] And without a doubt, getting the pipeline back to the private sector will re-energize the West Coast environmental movement to redouble efforts to stop the pipeline
It's because the goal capitalists are simply not able to meet the needs. Canadians and Canada's environment before short-term profits. It is a characteristic of capitalism, not (as they say) a bug
This article also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca
Image: David Climenhaga
Do you like this article? If you like, take a look for stories like this to happen.
Source link
