[ad_1]
According to the newspaper, he would have used an accredited laboratory to test several smartphones according to federal guidelines. The iPhones were fixed under a clear liquid formulated to simulate human tissue, while probes measured the radio frequency radiation absorbed by the liquid.
Several iPhones have exceeded the legal security limits set in the tests, but the iPhone 7 has been the worst performer. His exposure to RF radiation was over the legal limit and more than double what Apple reported to federal regulators.
The iPhone X slightly exceeded the limits in some tests, as was the iPhone 8, while the 8 Plus remained in the legal range. IPhones have been tested twice after Apple has provided information on the test method. The modified test "added steps to enable sensors designed to reduce the power consumption of phones."
In these modified tests, where a reporter held the iPhone to activate the sensors in question, the iPhone 8 was below the 5 mm limit, but the iPhone 7 the models were not. Apple has disputed the results found by The Chicago Tribune and said the lab had not tested the iPhones in the same way as Apple, although Apple had not clarified what had been wrongly done during the tests. Apple also said the modified tests had been poorly done.
Apple officials declined to be interviewed, and asked The Chicago Tribune to submit questions in writing, which have not been answered before publication. Apple later shared a statement that the test was inaccurate, "because the test setup did not conform to the procedures needed to properly evaluate the iPhone models."
"All models of iPhone, including iPhone 7, are fully certified by the FCC and in all other countries where the iPhone is sold, "he said. After careful review and validation of all iPhone models tested in the Tribune report, we have confirmed that we are in compliance and that we meet all the criteria. applicable … the guidelines and limits of exposure. "
The FCC, meanwhile, has announced that it will be doing its own tests over the next two months.
"We take seriously any allegations of non-compliance with the RF (Radio Frequency) Exposure Standards and will obtain and test the phones in question to verify their compliance with FCC rules," said the spokesperson for the company. 39, agency, Neil Grace.
The Samsung, Motorola and Vivo smart phones have also been tested and most of them have also demonstrated higher radiofrequency radiation levels than the FCC recommendations. The Chicago Tribuneis being tested.
The FCC and smartphone manufacturers are testing all new smartphones before they come on the market, ensuring that the devices comply with the RF radiation exposure standards. The Chicago Tribune says this is a problem because only one phone must succeed and manufacturers are allowed to select the test lab.
Although the tests can be carried out at a maximum distance of 25 mm, The Chicago Tribune used the distance that manufacturers choose for their own tests. In the case of Apple, it is 5 mm. A second test was also done at 2 mm to simulate the way most people carry their phones.
It should be noted that the tests were performed in such a way as to simulate the worst possible exposure conditions.
The phone was now operating at full power, creating what was essentially the worst scenario in terms of exposure to radio frequency radiation. As a rule, said Moulton, consumers are not exposed to such exposure. But that could happen, he said, in limited situations, such as someone who is continually talking in an area with a weak connection.
The Chicago Tribune indicates that its tests were not intended to classify phone models for security reasons and that in the limited tests only 11 models were examined. In many cases, only one device has been tested and, even in this case, the log indicates that it is not known if cell phones above the limits are likely to cause damage.
Apple tells customers worried about RF radiation exposure that using the hands-free option is an option. On some iPhone models, such as the iPhone 4 and 4, Apple recommends wearing the devices at least 10 mm from the body to ensure equal or equal exposure levels. under the levels tested. Apple made a similar suggestion with the iPhone 7 when submitting documentation to the FCC, but apparently would not have informed customers of the 5mm distance recommendation.
The FCC plans to do additional testing on smartphones for tracking, which should lead to a better understanding of smartphone security. For more information on test procedures and results, The Chicago TribuneThe full report goes into much more detail and deserves to be read by those concerned.
[ad_2]
Source link