[ad_1]
If a bookmaker were to evaluate the odds that an apocalyptic event is most likely to eliminate the human race, a pandemic would be more likely than a nuclear attack, a lifting operation or a asteroid. Epidemiologists and health professionals around the world agree that, despite the efforts of governments and agencies to prepare for the worst, the world is not prepared for a global epidemic of contagious disease deadly. In February 2017, Bill Gates warned that, unless drastic measures are taken quickly, a rapidly evolving airborne pathogen could kill more than 30 million people in less than 10 years. a year".
] Of all the threats of emerging diseases, the flu epidemic is the most worrisome, mainly because of the speed with which it can spread and the virulence with which it can kill. Recent research has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Spanish flu of 1918, which killed between 50 and 100 million people and was the deadliest in human history, was caused by birds. Today, the new avian influenza strains have unprecedented mortality rates, such as the H5N1 strain that first appeared in Hong Kong in 1997 and are becoming more regular than ever before.
The main new threat is H7N9, a strain of influenza has been discovered in a Chinese hen, which Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently consider most likely to cause a deadly pandemic in case of transfer and transmission by air. The virus was first detected in a human victim in 2013. Figures released last month indicate that the most recent H7N9 outbreak in October 2016 killed more people in China than the previous four influenza outbreaks. bird. produces a variant less sensitive to vaccines.
Although the main suspect is clearly identified, global preparedness for H7N9 is a problem. As Dr. Keiji Fukuda, former head of epidemiology at the CDC, says, humanity has "dodged a bullet" in the face of pandemics in recent years. Thanks to a combination of preparedness, quick action and luck, neither SARS in 2002, nor the swine flu in 2009, nor the Ebola virus in 2014 ended up being complete pandemics. We have few benchmarks to provide clues or models of what a world in a deadly epidemic might look like and how, in our connected society, we could prepare for the worst.
Irwin Redlener is the director of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness at Columbia University. With his team, he has spent the last 14 years studying disasters caused by climate change, terrorism or sick birds. Using data and computer models, they explored the different scenarios that may arise after the emergence of a new lethal and virulent strain of bird flu, and the results of these highly prophetic models are read as a zombie fiction.
February 2017 Bill Gates warned that, if drastic measures are not taken quickly, an airborne pathogen that moves rapidly "could kill more than 30 million people in less than a year "[19659007] Suppose the virus, a variant of the H7N9 virus, is detected for the first time in a patient exposed to live poultry on one of the rural poultry markets in China, where rigor and regulation currently applied Many of Hong Kong's markets have not yet been put in place. A week later, three more cases are detected and the patient dies at the hospital as a result of a pulmonary infection
. A laboratory run by the CDC in Atlanta is the first to examine a blood sample taken from the victim. CDC virologists confirm that they have detected a new strain of bird flu. The Chinese government, having the experience of managing such outbreaks, orders the closure of bird markets and the slaughter of tens of thousands of birds in the province where the first cases have been discovered.
days, hospitals continue to receive a significant flow of new cases: it is clear that neither the sacrifice nor the meticulous rules of the country to transport live animals are effective. It seems that this new virus can be transmitted from one person to another by the air we breathe.
A few days later, new cases of the disease are reported in neighboring countries of China, although it is not clear for now whether the virus has spread to trucks crossing borders or birds migrating in winter.
Almost immediately, predicts Redlener, international airports will begin to shut down to avoid intercontinental transmission. Air transport, where foreigners from geographical regions with different levels of vulnerability to disease are forced to remain in an enclosed space for an extended period of time, is currently the fastest way to travel.
Like Trench Hospitals and Canvas of the 1918 Spanish Flu Outbreak, an aircraft serves as an incubator for a virus and infects pbadengers who, after disembarking and dispersing, effectively spread the virus. As Ed Yong recently stated in The Atlantic when it is about spreading diseases, "while crossing the sky in countless planes, we transform from small fires in big world fires ".
The closure of the airport is also involved. late to stop the spread of the pandemic. In today's connected world, a disease can be transported from a rural village to any major city in 36 hours, faster than a government could apply. a policy of prohibition of theft. The first cases are reported in Europe and shortly thereafter in the United States. During these first few weeks, misinformation is plentiful, as during the Ebola outbreak in 2014, when false reports spread the spread of the virus. In cable news channels, some experts suggest that the outbreak is the result of irresponsible genetic research in China. Others suggest that this is part of a terrorist plot.
We have few benchmarks for providing clues or models about how a world could be at the heart of a contemporary deadly epidemic and how, in our connected society, we could prepare for the worst [19659007] The first schools are closed. "One of the most important things we can do in an emerging pandemic is to reduce infection in children," Redlener said. However, the models of action show that this precaution solves the same number of problems that it creates. "Who cares for children at home?" Redlener asks. "What happens if parents are infected, and what happens to the economy when parents can not work?" How do people buy food if they do not have it? income? "
Supply chains begin to collapse as the first local and regional economic consequences of the pandemic emerge. "Who delivers daily our food, our medicines and everything we need if there are infected people everywhere?" Asks Redlener. "Will we allow trucks to move between states if it increases the risk of spreading the disease?"
In a few weeks, supermarket shelves are empty. The queues at the service stations extend along the roads, at least during the few days when there is still gasoline.
The fragility of each extremely refined mechanism that guarantees the comfort and ease of contemporary living in the richest countries are exposed slowly and completely. The global health crisis goes from "being on the list of things that no one wants to do to the only task for many people," said Bill Steiger, who headed the Office of Global Health Affairs during meeting. George W. Bush's administration, Washington Post in April while discussing pandemic preparedness.
While the CDC issues recommendations every day (stay home, shut your mouth if you cough), President Trump responds with extravagant rhetoric. This time, however, rhetoric leads to even stronger measures. US borders with Canada and Mexico have been closed, martial law declared and Americans sick quarantined (and placed in detention camps as it turns out they have violated the curfew). Siding with public opinion about these epidemic conspiracies, Trump begins a trade war with China.
As the pandemic continues, we begin to see the inability of countries to respond. Hospitals, medical staff and drugs are tested using unprecedented methods. "The United States has done little to improve its ability to medically treat people affected by a pandemic," said Redlener. "We do not have enough antivirals, we do not have enough mechanical ventilators, it's very risky to know if we'll take care of people who need to be hospitalized in case of a pandemic and which way we would simply feel overwhelmed by the patients. "
] It is here that reveals the great complexity of a pandemic scenario: think about the ethical problems that will arise at the heart of a disaster. What happens, for example, when hospitals lack mechanical fans? Can a doctor tell a parent that since their child's chances of survival are lower than those of a young adult, will the respirator be confiscated? "There is simply no guidance on how to handle the huge shortage that we will find in the health system in the event of a pandemic," Redlener said.
Whether these hypothetical situations are plausible or exaggerated, Redlener believes that the consequences of any pandemic go beyond the current considerations of many disaster planners. The models can show how quickly a virus can travel the world, but they do not explain in detail the consequences of the collapse of society in the midst of a deadly pandemic. The whole world, says Redlener, is "absolutely not prepared."
Redlener and his colleagues are not alone in coming to these apocalyptic conclusions. In 2011, the World Health Organization launched a global initiative called Pandemic Influenza Preparedness (PGP), a program designed to stop or delay the onset of pandemic influenza. influenza and avoid the type of global disaster described above.
As part of the PGP, a network of more than 150 laboratories worldwide, known as the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System, controls influenza outbreaks, examines blood samples newly infected patients and monitors pharmacy sales of the drugs used. treat the symptoms of the disease. This research reports on the creation of the seasonal influenza vaccine, new versions of which are developed twice a year, and serves as a basis for advice that the World Health Organization gives governments to help them prepare for to a pandemic. [19659002] Many countries have developed their own plans. The United Kingdom, for example, has created the identifiable bird disease control strategy, which sets out the procedures to be followed in the event of an outbreak of a disease that could turn into a pandemic on the island. However, the World Health Organization is striving to better coordinate efforts and strategies of countries based on the experience of the 1918 Spanish flu: you can not fight a pandemic by treating each patient individually. They believe that a modern pandemic can only be conquered by treating the world in an interconnected way and not separately by nations.
"A pandemic is a global event," says Sylvie Briand, director of the Contagion Risk Management Department within a recently created World Health Organization emergency program. . "It must be managed nationally and internationally, a disease has no borders." Pardis Sabeti, one of the leading researchers on infectious diseases at Harvard University, said the same thing to The Atlantic earlier this year: "Viruses are a global threat for humanity, they are a common problem., they are the only threat that unites ".
The kind of threat that the supposed flu implies that it is different depending on the country from which it comes. "The problem is that up to now, the flu was perceived as a disease of rich and temperate countries," said Briand. "This is not the case, the flu is present everywhere, but in many tropical countries, where the mortality rate due to respiratory diseases is high, most of the time, they do not even know that this is due has the flu."
In 2014, the Obama administration pledged $ 1 million to a newly created badociation known as the Global Health Security Agenda. The program aims to help prevent the spread of deadly epidemics by strengthening basic public health systems in less developed countries whose goal is to combat epidemics. For example, he provided epidemiology training to health professionals in Mali and helped governments develop emergency plans to deal with an avian influenza epidemic. More than 30 countries have participated in badessments to determine their ability to detect and prevent epidemics (results, even negative ones, are made public). However, according to an internal badysis by the CDC, progress is still "fragile" and "requires continued funding".
Current efforts to improve international collaboration are encouraging. However, we can not predict how countries would react if they were asked for mutual support in the midst of a hypothetical pandemic.
"When, for example, there is a large coastal storm in the northeastern United States or something similar, Katrina in the Gulf region usually receives help from other cities and regions of the United States. the disaster area, "says Redlener. In other words, those who are not affected normally support those who are. "But a pandemic threatens everyone, no matter where, Boston can not expect to receive other fans from New York, Washington or Chicago, as these cities will need everything they have . " Resources are limited and, at all levels, from neighborhood to city to nation, the human instinct to take care of oneself is inevitably activated.
"A lot of work is needed to ensure collaboration in the event of a crisis," says Briand. "The tendency is for each country to accumulate vaccines and run its own preparedness plan, but we need to add a level of supranational readiness to ensure that the first hit does not monopolize all resources – a global event – the richest country. will have access to vaccines and the rest will not do it. "
Part of the problem for anyone facing this difficult situation is that it is very difficult to anticipate problems. Vaccination is by far the most effective way to defend against a pandemic. However, as Redlener says, the wheels of capitalism go against the research, development, manufacture and storage of vaccines (some of which expire in 12 months). "In a private manufacturing, development and research system," he says, "pharmaceutical companies may not have the capacity or the willingness to invest large sums of money. money in something that will not happen and can not be expected to come back. "
At the same time, the World Health Organization laboratories are continuing their efforts to speed up the drug preparation process in the hope of reducing the time needed to develop a new vaccine of at least six to four months. The speed at which flu can be transmitted is fundamental: the 1918 flu, in particular, killed more people in 24 weeks than AIDS in 24 years.
Today, the World Health Organization has insured 500 million people. generic flu shots, but may not be effective against a new strain of bird flu. According to Mr. Briand, these reserves will allow the world to face the first wave of a pandemic. But Redlener, on the contrary, remains firm and says that the reserves will be quite inadequate. "We do not have enough vaccines to stop a major pandemic influenza and less a killer infectious pandemic."
"The problem is that up to now, influenza was considered a disease of rich and temperate countries.The case is that the flu is everywhere, but in many tropical countries, where the death rate by most of the time, they do not even know that it is due to the flu "
International organizations have a crucial role to play in creating new forms of collaboration needed to cope with a possible pandemic. However, as Brexit and the rise of nationalist rhetoric on the world stage demonstrate, this collaboration is based on increasingly unstable foundations.
"Donald Trump was very open about" First America ", which is retrograde and inappropriate in relation to almost every major problem facing the world: economy, public health, climate change," said Redlener . In fact, during his first weeks in office, Trump proposed drastic cuts to government agencies fighting deadly epidemics.
During the 2014 Ebola outbreak, Trump tweeted that US aid workers should not return to North America ("who are out of here!", he wrote ), so that they do not spread the disease. This is a way of thinking that suggests that Trump would be reluctant to send American help to help cope with epidemics in other countries. "Fragmenting our countries only increases the threat posed by a pandemic," Redlener said.
For the World Health Organization, the need for continued international collaboration is crucial not only in the case of a pandemic, but also during exercises. and building defenses for such an event. "The preparation requires a continuous effort," explains Briand. "The mechanisms are strong only if you use them frequently, the people change, the guidelines change, also simulation exercises must be done constantly to make sure that the plan is up to date and really ready to deal with unexpected. " 19659002] When can we expect the appearance of another bird flu? All the experts interviewed as part of these articles said that a major non-pandemic risked appearing, but that it was dangerously imminent.
The World Health Organization is currently monitoring several avian influenza viruses that, according to Briand, "have pandemic potential". Among them is the recently discovered H10N8, a disease of unknown origin that killed its first human victim in China four years ago. Since then, the CDC has monitored more than 300 outbreaks in 160 countries and monitored 37 dangerous pathogens in the past year.
It is clear that we are not prepared. How would we be? You can not do a simulation of the company's collapse. Health systems around the world are already struggling to meet the needs of our populations in terms of growth and aging, as well as to address those that may arise after a pandemic disaster. Meanwhile, xenophobia and other nationalistic and introspective positions run counter to international politics and the necessary collaboration to prevent a local epidemic from becoming a pandemic.
In his January article, Bill Gates wrote that he felt optimistic and that with a little effort, humanity could still avoid the worst. "In a decade, we will be much better prepared for a deadly epidemic if we are willing to devote a fraction of our spending to defense budgets and new weapons systems in anticipation of the epidemic."
as Redlener says, "remains to be manifested". As long as it will not manifest, we will continue to live under the menacing shadow of flying birds in the gray sky.
[ad_2]
Source link