Controversy over the alleged creation of Lulu and Nana

The institution says "deeply shocked by the case" and urges leave him on leave since February this year, to come as soon as possible to give explanations . "The University will convene international experts to investigate this incident, which constitutes a serious violation of ethics and academic standards," said the institution on the project, which also raised questions on its veracity. published in no scientific journal.

For its part, the Chinese press acknowledged that the study had sparked controversy between academics and the public across the country. The China Daily newspaper highlights concerns "about ethics and its effectiveness" and reveals that the parents of the two babies are people living with HIV, according to Bai Hua, head of Baihualin, a non-governmental organization that is not responsible for HIV. occupies people with HIV. Disease.

While, more than 120 scholars of the Chinese scientific community pointed out in a statement published on Sina Weibo the Chinese equivalent of Twitter, that "any attempt" to modify the genetic modifications are "foolish "and giving birth to these babies is" high risk ". "The government must take quick legislative measures to strictly supervise such research," added a Chinese scientist.

See also: The genetic modification of twins produces an ethical veto: a Colombian scientist

one day before researchers in this field begin a large meeting on genome modification, which [19459004willbeheldfrom27to29NovemberinHongKong. Overall, the journal Nature also participated in the debate and, in one article, states that this announcement caused a "scandal" among the international scientific community and that, if true, "would represent an important step forward in the use of the genome modification "human. "

" It's premature, dangerous and irresponsible, "said Joyce Harper, a researcher at University College London ." This experiment exposes normal and healthy children to risks without real benefit, "says the magazine, and Nature points out that this type of tool has only been used to date to study its benefits for the elimination of disease-causing mutations, and adds that the scientific community" has been asking for long "the creation of ethical principles long before

Read also: A scientist claims to be the first to genetically modify babies

In 2016, a group of Chinese scientists became a pioneer in the # 39, human use, especially in patients with lung cancer, genetic modification technology CRISPR, reported by Nature magazine.Scientists from the United Kingdom however, discovered that gene modification technology CRISPR could cause more damage to cells than previously thought, according to a study published this year by the same newspaper.