[ad_1]
Frank Kudelka made his debut on the bench of University of Chile against La Serena, on the Cup of Chile, and the Blues won by 4 -1 at the stadium of La Portada. This is a landslide that has attracted attention, because of the new format of play set up by the Argentine coach, with the team that was evolving in the field, thanks to their fast transitions, an aggressive game of tapes and insurmountable interest recover the ball soon.
However, this aspect of U football has been losing since. The blues did not return to show the systematicity in such gambling behaviors, which make up – no more or less – than the announced identity stamp of Argentina when Kudelka landed . The student cadre still presents tactical problems in progress, recognized at the time by the DT and which generate some doubts in the preparation of his debut in the tournament, which will be this Sunday against Huachipato at the National Stadium.
Tibia
This is a detail to correct, admitted by the players and by Kudelka himself, especially after the matches of Copa Chile. The U is very hard to start once he loses the ball and therefore the opposing team has precious seconds for his game, so those who suffer from this detail are the last line members and also, for moments, Johnny Herrera.
The desire to remove or demote to the established pressure zone does not flow instantly, mainly flyers forward. In the inclusion of Rafael Caroca against Cobreloa in Calama, as a midfielder inside the midfield, a goal was expected to increase the defensive intensity in the middle field and, for moments, the case worked
] Kudelka lined up three attackers at any time, under the tactical idea of having two men who go in-depth on the points and help those who accompany the play through the center (& # 39; 9 & # 39 ;, the other pointer and the interior flyers). In the first game against La Serena, the idea worked properly and the goal of Yerko Leiva was specified under these parameters, although the one who sent the center was Jean Beauséjour, left back However, later the eaves did not become transcendental in the tipping attacks and, rather, they became the processing game's treatment.
However, in the second victory before Cobreloa there was a slight escape on this subject. The first goal of Isaac Diaz was the product of a corner created by an overflow attempt from the right of Yerferson Soteldo and the second figure of the attacker was another blue center header after a Venezuelan center, which took speed to his marker by the seashore.
Lack of verticality
This was a permanent criticism of Kudelka to the action of the team during the games in the break for the ] Cup of the Russian world. The U, in most moments and extremely in the home duels, decided in a game of excessive possession of the ball, without tactical arguments to find offensive depth. The most accurate sample was against Cobreloa: at the National, the Blues played and played against a rival grouped with two lines of four in front of their surface. The narrow 2-1 at home reflected the lack of ability to go ahead and create a danger.
After, in Calama, the team was more upright and that was the case, because the local was playing more advanced and I give him the spaces to be able to attack. In this tactical scenario, the U has found solutions to the advances of football in the field, but in National will always be the opposite. perhaps, the exploration of a midfielder with men back and forth obvious (eg, the Panamanian Armando Cooper) and "pointers-pointers" (the guys looking for the bottom line and sending center
Rigid Scheme
Kudelka did not "crash" with a gambling system that was to be introduced in the U, noting that the positioning system to use was to be a product of how to find the campus.However, in the six games that he played in the Chile Cup he always started playing with the system. 1-4-1-2-3 and he did not move more than this tactical device.
With Francisco Arancibia and Soteldo for tips and with Díaz, Mauricio Pinilla or Leandro Benegas for the center, the formula is clearly attractive, but what happened when it was not e u all these men? DT tried with Leiva and Benegas in the eave posts and the idea of overflow, triumph in the one-on-one and centerpieces. sending with the intention did not materialize. In such circumstances, was not it more feasible to eliminate an attacker and add another flyer? Kudelka insisted with the trio of strikers, stripping an unshakable faith, although the indications, at various times, do not act according to the offensive demands of the post
Source link
