Gustavo Sáez on the Bake Off Chile critics' final: "Every program has its identity" | Exclusive



[ad_1]

This Sunday, the grand finale of Bake Off Chile was broadcast, a show that sought the best amateur confectioner and whose winner was the talented Allison Ramsay, which was predictable for many. However, a small mistake could have removed him from this position, as the jury Gustavo Sáez explained.

In an interview on page 7, the baker declared that the finalists were chosen for the good performance they had obtained in each test and not for the program in general. It was so surprising that Valeria López was in fourth place. The previous ones had demonstrated his excellent level, being in third place Marisol Pierola. "In the program, each preparation was evaluated, and that is why Allison and Alfonso reached the final, but an error could have left one or the other side" [19459007saidSáez

Despite this, he pointed out that a good pastry chef is tested if he is consistent even though he may fall out on occasion. "If it's still good, it'll go far" said the jury of Bake Off Chile .

Although during the final, we do not really know what made Ramsay win, Gustavo explained that there were three details that made the difference between her and Alfonso. "Although it has evolved very well over time, it has made great strides, but Allison's (in the cake) work with respect to taste, consistency and presentation was superior ".

Regarding the general level of participants, Sáez was honest: "At first, I was a little shocked, because I was used to evaluating professionals and not amateurs, but at the level amateur, one can make the difference, techniques, taste, composition regardless of the level, you can distinguish between one and the other. "

Final Critic [19659010] CHV ” width=”567″ height=”314″ clbad=”size-full wp-image-426470″/>

CHV

Many viewers criticized the level of the final, those who found it. little glamorous to be the chapter where the winner was chosen, even some wondered why they had not done it live and compared it to those made for MasterChef .

In this context, given that the production of the program explained to that it was impossible to do it live, because it was long-term tests and that it was not. there is no programmatic grid that preserves this era being the only thing recorded a few days later, the last case where the name of the winner was announced, so that the result is not filtered.

On comparisons, Gustavo was categorical: "Every program is different and I find it best that everyone has their identity.It would not be the idea that Bake off ] was the version of MasterChef but pastry, this is not the idea ".

In addition, he said that television spaces should evolve. "It was maybe like that, I think, because it was the first season, so when it was the first time, I think it was good enough and in the following ones, they will improve according to the public ".

Will there be a new season ?: "I am a simple jury and I do not know if there will be another, but I am happy that it exists" concluded the pastry chef.

[ad_2]
Source link