[ad_1]
The Legislative Power is once again causing controversy over the economic figures organized for the work of its members and the transparency with which they are used.
"National Travel" is the name with which we call it $ 95,880 that every deputy and senator receives daily to attend the Congress, either at the seat of Santiago, or at Valparaíso.
This amount is justified by the fact that many parliamentarians must leave their region is different from that received for trips abroad and is perceived by legislators regardless of the expenses already covered by the fuel or tickets. Therefore, it is actually intended for a accommodation and eventual meals purchased outside the dining rooms of each bench, where consumption is also covered.
The maximum amount of daily allowances that may be received by a Member of Parliament or a Senator is fixed by the Council for the Resolution of Parliamentary Summons, which sets this period at 15 days for the months with four weeks of Parliament and 12 days for the three weeks only Legislature in favor of a district.
The decision of the Resolution Council rejects travel expenses for unattended or medical license days, but leaves the possibility that the amount may be charged by a member of Parliament living in Valparaíso.
the debate is open again Is the handing over of this figure to parliamentarians justified by the fact that they attend the headquarters and functions that constitute their daily work? [1 9659007] Opinions
The representative of the Democratic Revolution, Pablo Vidal, considers that transparency is as important as the amount, "because, for example, hotel offers are numerous and prices vary enormously". [19659003] In this regard, Congressional sources state that the majority of parliamentarians remain in Valparaiso in the O Hotel Higgins Park, located opposite the seat of Parliament. The price of a single room with a double bed has a value of per night of 38 000 pesos . "Some pay the full amount, some part of it, with the specific hosting bill, etc. In R & D, we do it, our website contains the details of our expenses, 25% is a contribution to the party then every element that we detail even beyond what the law requires, "he says. Vidal thinks that this A new controversy brings back two arguments to the table. " The need for ". to lower the parliamentary system, including that of ministers and judges . We must level the reality of people, "he said. A second point is that should be discussed" that the Congress be held in Valparaíso because everyone must go to Santiago first, then travel, we, journalists, guests, committees. Each year, we generate an extra expense under the decentralization argument, which is not realized. " Christian Democrat MP Raúl Soto is another opponent of the lack of regulations on travel costs." regulate the situation of the granting of daily allowances to parliamentarians, "adding that " was to be extended to other state authorities ". " It is necessary to better regulate the distribution of public resources for this purpose concept I think that it is absolutely necessary that everything is transparent, that the errors and responsibilities that have been made are badumed and that investigations are also conducted to determine whether they are safe. there were irregularities, "Soto said, adding that this could not be left out."
In this regard, he states that the resources allocated "often go directly to the pockets of parliamentarians and that, therefore, the call is to better regulate." this way. "
" Common sense tells us that it is reasonable to pay for accommodation, tickets s, especially for official travel, on behalf of the institution concerned or for official travel. However, the viaticum that goes directly into the pocket for another type of expense, the food, whatever, in our opinion, is not justified, does not abandon what is done effectively with this money and can perfectly be for the parliamentary pocket therefore, it must be regulated. "
Accounting Problems
The new criticisms concerning the delivery of these" national travel expenses "result from an accounting problem in the Chamber of Deputies which resulted in payments of more than 100 parliamentarians. [19659003AccordingtotheinformationpublishedbyLaTercerathepaymentsforthisconceptcorrespondingtothemonthofJunewerebeyondthelimitofthelaw
That day, Miguel Landeros, Secretary General of the Chamber, recognized the Irregularity and presented the actions to follow to correct the error.
"It is a failure of our accounting that made a bad payment in the month of June and updated in the month of July. He paid three more days and counted these three days to a number of deputy ministers who determine the number. We ordered an internal summary when I learned Tuesday the administrative responsibilities of the employees involved in this case. "
" As I learned today, some parliamentarians who were affected then formulated the respective request and unfortunately our internal service did not act correctly, "warned Landeros.
The secretary badured, as a result of the problem they ordered" a complete overhaul of everything ", this will surely include from March.In addition, he denied any manipulation of information.
"There is no manipulation. It turns out that it's as if they were paying your salary, paying you a per diem and making a mistake (the employer), do not change the month, because it's still your salary, and it's about even for the next month. What they do is an internal compensation. "
Finally, Landeros badured that he would announce the results of the review that will make the payments, perhaps by 11 March at the latest.
[ad_2]
Source link
