Now, it turns out that Pinto was to blame

While it's all over for Makarena Pinto, but the truth is that there should not have even been a problem that had brought her about to lose the purse Proddar. Yesterday he knew that he would continue to collect the profit, but we also knew, because the IND had informed him, that it was a mistake of the gymnast who l & rsquo; had withdrawn from the system.

Pinto's complaint was the event in which she had been evaluated, the Pan American. Gymnastics was on top when she returned to training, after a pregnancy and a cesarean section. The brief preparation did not allow him to shine individually (although the team obtained an unprecedented ranking at the Pan American Games) and was informed that, having not achieved the objectives, he had lost the purse.

But it is Pinto and his technical staff who informed him that this would be their The fundamental event of the season, that is to say they could have chosen another, in 2019. To know the deadlines, nothing would have happened.

"The director of Proddar at that time told me that I had to be evaluated this year, and that was all there was to do," says Pinto.

Indeed, Sports Minister Pauline Kantor explains that the problem stems from misinformation and procedural problems: "She could have set another date, but I do not believe it's her mistake, but a failure of the way the Proddar provides the information, it is not clear, and the athletes receive it from third parties, not directly. "

Disinformation is proven by the fact that the minister herself was scandalized last week by the loss of the Pinto fellowship, without realizing that, as IND says, it was an athlete 's mistake.

This ignorance was the argument that the technical panel was canceling the suspension of the scholarship, a good news that was reported yesterday to Pinto, who was in Peru, with the minister and the president. MPs Erika Olivera and Marcela Sabat.

"It is unclear whether the technical group has the full context for making a decision, and there are athletes who have had a history of, for example, injuries, and whose badessment is not correct. 39, was not taken into account, "says Olivera.