[ad_1]
Francisco Orrego failed to occupy the position of executive chairman of national television for eight months and decided to take a step back in a decision made by surprise and source of annoyance at La Moneda
. I had not had a good time and I had already indicated that its continuity was uncertain. But their departure should not be so brutal, because they were waiting for it before the end of the year. Hence the phrase "do not spoil the day", to which President Sebastián Piñera responded when asked questions about it.
"He had stated that he was completing a stage during which he had directed TVN year and thus his resignation was accepted," said Cecilia Perez, head of Segegob who is in charge of relations with the chain.
At La Moneda, they tried to give a signal of normality. According to the spokesman, "the arguments of the former president of TVN are personal, they result in a resignation of the role that he had asked President Sebastián Piñera to play and this resignation was accepted" [19659002] The spokeswoman also added that Orrego's appointment "has been studied" and that they must now find a successor. "The processes are staged and the president is looking for a replacement to chair the TVN board," said the minister.
"Friendly fire" of Chile Vamos
But in the middle of the crisis, the Government is also facing "friendly fire", because the departure of Orrego has triggered criticism of the ranks of Chile Vamos. "The resignation of Orrego clearly shows that the government does not have the political will to make the changes to TVN." Minister Perez was pbadive with respect to TVN, she n & # 39; The chain is collapsing and she does not realize it, "said deputy Andrés Celis, who" called on the government to put the batteries with TVN. "
At the same time, the deputy, RN Gonzalo Fuenzalida, said that" the failure of Orrego is not because of him, but because lack of government support, "La Tercera reports.
Critics of Congress reflected in these remarks pro-government parliamentarians are not new to the government. From Parliament, it was conveyed to La Moneda that the figure of Orrego was more part of the problem than of the solution. The proof is its zero management to achieve the capitalization of TVN, whose last resources were obtained during the negotiation of the budget, a space where Orrego played no role.
The Aguirre Factor
The Key Factor of the Resignation Orrego had relations with the board of directors and the station's executive director, Jaime de Aguirre.
Without mentioning it directly in the letter he sent to President Piñera to resign, Orrego was directing his darts against TV Wire December 2016 is the executive director of TVN. "I am convinced that even if the TVN leadership remains in the hands of the same people who brought it to the current crisis, it will not be possible to move the chain forward," was the only way out. the most controversial expression of the letter of Orrego. [19659002] The disagreements between Orrego and De Aguirre have long existed: in July, the contract of the executive director of the station was leaked and the immediate suspicions of workers and opposition administrators fell on the president of the council d & # 39; administration.
This last section was transmitted to La Moneda by Orrego in order to lower the revolutions against De Aguirre, although the initial instruction was to move it away from the cbad. However, the thread was cut by the chairman of the board, fixing the problem with his. resignation
The corollary of mismanagement
In the chain, they interpret the premature departure of Orrego as the corollary of the mismanagement and regret of having learned press "of his resignation.
The representative of state-run workers, journalist Consuelo Saavedra, said that " Orrego has really acted in the worst way possible, with a lack of leadership, "while the Prensa Cbad Union accuses him of" leaving the chain with a hundred layoffs and being charged with violation of the law "
The president of the TVN Press Union, Rodrigo Cid, also comments the remarks made by Orrego responsible for the crisis of the chain is not valid because" to deliver as argument that the changes could not be made while today the board is the one who has the power to make the decisions of the company, I think this is not a valid reason to present this resignation. "
" In simple terms, dismiss the executive director (Jaime de Aguirre) requires five votes (out of a total of nine) and Francisco Orrego apparently, it was his intention, no It managed to reunite them ", commented on the statements to Radio Universe
<! – Download the attached document of this news ->
[ad_2]
Source link