[ad_1]
On Wednesday afternoon, Congress released the public sector budget by 2019, meeting the deadline set by MPs and senators to finalize La Moneda's proposal.
Notwithstanding, since the party in power had already made reservations of constitutionality on two points.
First, the controversial decision of to leave the reserved expenditure of the Carabineros without any amount, which will be challenged before the Constitutional Court (TC) by the President of the National Renovation (RN), the deputy Mario Desbordes.
The previous thing, so that this instance eliminates the legal dispute that was raised about which the organic law on carabinieri and the armed forces establishes a minimum floor for the reserved expenses and not as opposition parliamentarians warn that a 2003 law establishes that it is the finance law of each year that should: determine these amounts.
"The idea is that parliamentarians should approach the Constitutional Court in a cross-cutting manner to decide whether it is possible to contravene the provisions of the organic laws of the institutions with regard to the minimum threshold of expenditure reserved," Overflow
But in the opinion of the President of the Senate, Carlos Montes, the discussion goes beyond the budget debate and ensures that the executive has legal tools to solve the problem of its funding of expenditures reserved for carabineros.
the general situation of the institution. Knowing that the executive has many instruments to correct it along the way, but giving a clear signal. You can rebadign or go to the TC even if you insist on having an apartment. We have always been proud of our police and we are now faced with a set of situations that we must overcome quickly and thoroughly. "
Solidarity Fund Surpluses
Another aspect that pro-government MPs want to bring to the CT is the luster that public universities allow to dispose of the surplus solidarity fund for real estate and Gratuidad funding particularly of nearly 22,000 students who would be deprived of this benefit next year.
Senator Yasna Provost (DC) defended the eligibility of the indication and stated that those who advertise their participation in the TC are the same people who opposed the gratuity.This is why he launched "a call for us to build a higher education policy".
Among the parliamentarians of Chile, we announced that they would appeal the Tribunal for this reason, are the deputy J Belollio likes (UDI) and Senator José García Ruminot (RN).
For his part, the Minister Secretary General The Presidency, Gonzalo Blumel, pointed out that the executive power was of the opinion that said indication was inadmissible and guaranteed parliamentarians who wish to contest the right to appeal from this instance.
[ad_2]
Source link
