Christine Blasey Ford’s attorneys call Kavanaugh’s investigation “sham” after new details emerge



[ad_1]

The Department of Justice letter, released today by the office of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, confirms what we knew: the FBI investigation into Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s serious allegations regarding the sexual misconduct of Judge Brett M . Kavanaugh was a sham and a major institutional failure, “Blasey Ford’s attorneys Debra Katz and Lisa Banks said in Thursday’s statement. “Not only did the FBI refuse to interview Dr. Ford or the corroborants listed in our letter to FBI Director Wray, it failed to act on the more than 4,500 tips it received about the candidate from the Kavanaugh era Instead, he handed the information to the White House, allowing those who supported Kavanaugh to falsely claim that the FBI found no wrongdoing.

Kavanaugh was confirmed in Supreme Court in October 2018, after Blasey Ford and two other women accused him of sexual misconduct, which he denied. The Senate voted to confirm Kavanaugh on a 50-48 vote.

On Thursday, Whitehouse’s office said a group of seven Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee wrote to Wray asking for additional information on the 2018 FBI investigation into Kavanaugh.

“The confessions in your letter corroborate and explain numerous credible accounts from individuals and businesses that they contacted the FBI with information” highly relevant to (…) allegations “of sexual misconduct by the judge Kavanaugh, then to be ignored, “the senators wrote in the letter. “If the FBI was unauthorized or did not act on any of the tips it received from the whistleblower line, it’s hard to understand the value of having a whistleblower line.”

Lawyers for Blasey Ford said in their statement that the Kavanaugh investigation “should never have been a regular background check”, adding that the FBI and the Trump administration “hid the bullet on this” in with regard to the 4,500 Supreme Court’s current justice councils. .

The FBI did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the statements.

[ad_2]

Source link