College admissions scandal: USC states that a lawsuit against Loughlin and Giannulli is possible in the future



[ad_1]

But an allegation of conflict of interest involving the couple's law firm, considered "totally speculative" by a lawyer from Loughlin and Giannulli, was revealed in a letter in response to the government's request for a hearing concerning possible conflicts of interest in the case.

Loughlin and Giannulli are among dozens of wealthy parents who have been accused of using their means to thwart competitive college admissions.

Prosecutors said the couple had paid $ 500,000 to a fake charity to have their two daughters accepted at school, falsely branding them as team recruits.

Loughlin and Giannulli both pleaded not guilty to conspiracy to commit fraud and conspiracy to launder money. Each of the charges is punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

Lawyer William J. Trach of Latham & Watkins Law Firm sent a letter in response to the government motion. The firm represents Loughlin and Giannulli in their federal record in the college admissions scandal, but also represents the university in an unrelated case.

The USC coach who created a fake crew profile for Lori Loughlin's girls pleads guilty

"USC has suggested that Latham's portrayal of Ms. Loughlin and Mr. Giannulli could conflict with her interests in potential civil litigation with these people," Trach wrote. "But any such civil litigation in the future is completely speculative, Latham does not propose to represent Ms. Loughlin or Mr. Giannulli in such a civil litigation, USC has never explained how the representation of the accused by Latham in this case would have an impact on such a civil dispute. "

The letter also states that it is unrealistic to fear that either party will seek to quash a conviction by relying on an ineffective lawyer.

A lawyer and a vineyard owner of high power plead guilty in a scam on admission to college

Trach noted in the letter: "After carefully reviewing the applicable ethical rules and the precedent in light of the substance and scope of our statements, our company concluded that there was no conflict of laws. 39, current or foreseeable interest and that we took appropriate steps to: avoid any such conflict of interest during the course of the proceedings. "

He writes that Loughlin and Giannulli both have a co-counsel who can represent them if they have to interview a university employee.

CNN sought the advice of the University of Southern California and the lawyers for Loughlin and Giannulli.

[ad_2]

Source link