[ad_1]
The video that Senator Paloma Valencia watched in Tuesday's plenary session, in which Senator Gustavo Petro is seen receiving several sums of money, continued to spark political controversy in Congress.
The discussion has now come to the House of Representatives, in the First Committee, where before the vote on policy reform began on Wednesday, the controversial video was relayed and the spirit regained strength. .
The representative in the Chamber, Gabriel Santos, of the Democratic Center, who introduced him, said that "what is Dr. Petro complaining about when he has such benefactors, what is it?" he could do is to put this money in the accounts of the state and pay his millionaire debts. "
He even claimed that Petro should clarify to the country that received the money, this because, if the senator says that it is Simón Vélez, who is paisa, the video is listening to D & C. A man from the coast. "It's a serious complaint, even if it's an old video, it's a person who wants to govern the country."
Santos, son of Colombia's current ambbadador to the United States, Francisco Santos, also pointed out that this would be the perfect opportunity for proponents of the anti-corruption consultation to show that they would not be able to do anything. They had no electoral desire.
HAVLÓ PETRO
In turn, Senator Gustavo Petro said that the video clearly answers all the questions that are asked about the origin, the amount and the place where he received the money. "The video is presented without the clarity of the audio, the full audio, they can review it, it establishes the source of resources, what it serves, where and on what date. I give myself the date in the video because I get a call, I make an appointment at home and gives the exact address.The video is 14 years old. "
Petro repeats that the money is provided by the architect Simón Vélez, "who wanted to lend me the resources, and why he was in cash, because he uses it, he does not financial transactions, the video also says, they cost 20 million pesos.
Petro disputed the fact that Senator Paloma Valencia, at the time of presenting the video in plenary, left open the interpretation that consisted of Odebrecht money or so-called favors to the Bogota mayor and even that They were resources of Venezuela.
For its part, the lawyer of Gustavo Petro, Julio César Ortiz, said that "it is a video taken illegally by a former partner of Senator Petro for more than 14 years. years as part of an internal activity of collecting resources for the maintenance and support of the movement. "
"This does not correspond to any act of bribery or to receiving money from contractors or from an employer." The perverse and malicious intent to use clandestine and illegal registration of an ex-partner of an absolutely legal activity, "said the lawyer.
Ortiz added: "We are aware of what they are going to do, but it is a long time ago and we investigated that there was no breach of the law. or the election regulations, or Senator Gustavo Petro or the movement. " that he was heading at that time. "
Senator Petro is expected to speak on Tuesday in the Senate plenary.
[ad_2]
Source link
