[ad_1]
Last Tuesday, River Plate was eliminated by Gimnasia and Esgrima de La Plata in the semifinals of Copa Argentina. After the 2-2 draw, the cross-band team sank 4-5 on penalties. However, beyond the result, the party was involved in a controversy by a decision of the meeting's judge, Facundo Tello, who expelled "millionaire" defender Javier Pinola for attacking a rival team player in the area and without However, he did not grant a criminal, so many people wonder if he acted correctly.
The game was played on a corner and the judge argued that, since the ball was not in play at the time, the decision could only be to remove the defender from the court without penalizing the penalty.
However, what the action pictures show, is that the elbow was manufactured at the same time as the payment. Therefore, in addition to the penalty inflicted on Pinola, the referee had to inflict the penalty.
In this case, FUTBOLRED had consulted the Arbitration Advisor José Borda, who had confirmed that the move should have ended in 12 steps. In addition, he refuted Tello's badertion that the balloon was not in motion: "the balloon had to be indicted for a reason: at the corner kick, the lorry" Assistant referee authorizes the prosecution and moves to regain his place in the penultimate player.A procedure established after a corner charge, if the referee has not given the charge. order, it stays calm and does not allow the player to be charged ".
Similarly, FIFA regulations state that a sanction will be decreed in case of aggression in the zone "regardless of the
position of the ball, as long as it is in play. "Thus, as the ball was moving, there is no doubt that the judge was wrong.
Source link
