[ad_1]
He even pointed out that Vélez preferred to make the loan in cash because he did not like to make electronic transactions, corroborated version by the interview of Gatopardo magazine, in which Vélez says that I even kept the money I collect for Petro and Vargas in jars in his kitchen.
After having examined the version of Petro and the words of the architect Simón Vélez during his interview with Gatopardo, several questions and facts arise and that we report below.
1. If the video is 14 years old, as Petro says, any irregularities of an administrative or electoral nature would have already been prescribed by law. If there is a criminal offense, an investigation can always be conducted.
2. 14 years ago, in 2004, the clear accounts of the National Electoral Council were not applied. It was therefore impossible to find contributors to campaigns numerically.
3. In 2004, Petro was a camera representative and had been a member of Congress for two years. True to its version, the money was therefore intended for a political campaign, it would be for the 2006 campaign.
4. In 2004, two campaigns were organized: Polo, belonging to Petro, Garzón to the mayor of Bogotá, elected in October 2003, and Carlos Gaviria to the presidency in 2006.
5. If the person appearing in the video is the architect Simón Vélez and we refer to his statements in the magazine Gatopardo, in which he mentions having raised funds for Petro in 2016 and for Vargas Lleras, he is clear that it was for his presidential campaigns. in 2018.
6. Neither Petro nor Vargas Lleras have reported any contributions of individuals named Simón Vélez in their accounting books registered with the CNE, which are configured in such a way that The current law can impose a prison sentence of 4 to 8 years and millions of fines of up to 1,200 legal monthly minimum wages in force.
7. Due to the quality of the video image, which is not digital, one could give credibility to the version of Petro recorded 14 years ago.
8. Who gave the video to Paloma Valencia and why so far decides to make it public?
9. Did you inform the authorities before presenting it to the debate?
10. In which hands has this video been seen in the last 14 years?
11. Why did Petro know that they were going to project the video and two hours before he warned them that they had bought it to divert the debate over the resources of Odebrecht? ?
[ad_2]
Source link
