[ad_1]
It is too early to draw definitive conclusions. The pain of elimination by penalties before a selection of England is still very fresh that has never been superior to the combined native, but to be more effective in shooting the twelve stages, it forbids us the opportunity to repeat the action of four years ago and even improve it.
The dream was not far away. An equal match in which neither team did its best football, and where the defenses were the protagonists, both for the mistakes and for their success. Neither England nor Colombia have been able to develop clear opportunities, nor to find a tactical scheme that would give them any light. On the contrary, the game was abrupt and the match was more fought with enthusiasm and drive than with an organized game idea.
The party judge, the controversial American Mark Geiger, deserves a separate chapter, which came from a penalty. six months without being able to whistle the international matches, which, from the beginning to the end, have benefited the British team with their performance, to the point of despairing a usually calm player like Falcao García.
But despite the terrible work of the central referee, I do not want to focus solely on him and claim that the departure of the World Cup team is his responsibility. Colombia, despite the claw and tenacity left on the ground, was unclear today and adopted a wrong approach that almost eliminated them in the 90 minutes. A gaming system that generated little in the offensive and that was weak when it was attacked, and that even with the variants was found with football that he had intended to express today in the field. The laterals, who in theory would have the freedom to search for something in attack, something they needed throughout the tournament, were imprecise in the finishing touches and failed to generate danger. Maybe in the last minutes, Mojica, who was the one who tried the most, managed to reach more precision in his pbades, but it became too repeated and they were easily controlled by the English
there There were plenty of spaces that fortunately England did not enjoy, especially with a Barrios who despite the warning tolerated the game well and complicated the life of the English strikers. However, there was no one to take the team from behind with clarity and could join in the attack, while in the middle the circuits were disconnected with each player wanting to do the same. 39; individual without seeking to create partnerships on the ground that would allow them to generate options of the attack on an England who after the goal fell back and did not try it on the counter.
The players who had the responsibility of generating football were not lean. Neither Quintero nor Cuadrado were partners with Falcao, let alone met to try to unbalance an England that, despite the youth, managed to pull Colombia out of the party in many pbadages and, supported by bad decisions of Arbitration, desperately "Tricolor" and he cut the pace. Merit for the British or lack of liveliness of Colombia, that with two adroit attack flyers failed to force a single bullet into English territory.
With the only corner shot that Colombia got in 90 minutes, which It denotes a palpable offensive deficiency and the impossibility of creating and finalizing attack options, appeared the blessed head of the Hero of the "Coffee Growers" in this World Cup to take the team out of the abyss where she had already fallen. How is it possible that by having such a valuable weapon in Yerry Mina's forehead, we will not be able to generate corner kicks or free kicks near the area?
Why before a limited England in defense we released three brand leaflets and none that could be added to the attack? These are questions that only Pékerman will be able to answer when the elimination tide has gone down, if he answers it, because we still do not know why he took out Aguilar de Guarín in the match against Brazil. four years.
We know that Colombia is "dependent James". That when the "10" is not on the ground, the clarity is lost and the offensive power decreases significantly. There is not yet a player wearing the figure and warrior costume that the Bayern player has tattooed on his skin, and that is why Colombia is changing not only its pattern but even the identity of his game when he is not there. 19659002] Today more than ever his absence was noticed because of the lack of character of the players called to replace him, who went unnoticed and do not know how to throw the team on his shoulder or at least try to qualify one of the best strikers in the world Mina's goal at the end of the 90 minutes gave Colombia a mental injection that significantly improved his game. In the first fifteen rounds, he eventually became the owner of the game. endangered an England who saw how the Colombians could turn the score and pbad. However, the cleaning lasted only fifteen minutes while the second half of the course was reserved for England.
Because of the way the match was presented and the way the team approached, it was a victory. shots on goal, where he was close to obtaining glory after the penalty saved by Ospina in the final lottery. Unfortunately the pulse failed Uribe and Bacca in a case where more than football needs cold blood.
Maybe what can alleviate a little the pain of this elimination, is to know that in the future the selection will be able to meet the parties with more weapons and more experience to solve some situations that may arise during games and learn to use them for their own benefit.
This heavy defeat, if it is considered something more than an isolated event, is taken as an example of delivery, can leave us valuable lessons to challenge the final matches with more force, d & # 39; And efficiency, and as it is popularly said, with more "short".
[ad_2]
Source link
