[ad_1]
In social networks circulated messages that indicated to the selection of England to violate the International Federation of Football Association ( FIFA ) to make two changes during the extra time. The information is false, the entry of the players Danny Rose in the minute 102 and Marcus Rashford in the 113 & # 39; was adjusted to the rules.
The controversy over the four changes that England made before Colombia two of them in regulatory time, arose at the end of a game questioned by Arbitration of the American Mark Geiger, in the stadium of Moscow Spartak . The social media posts suggest that the teams had to make three changes within 90 minutes to qualify for the fourth substitution allowed by the settlement during the extension.
A trill of the sports journalist Alejandro Farffann who to date has been shared more than 3 thousand times, fueled the controversy.
WARNING! #ENG violated the settlement of #Mundial # Russia2018 made two changes in overtime. The settlement is very clear: you can make the fourth change, if and only if, the three changes were made during the regular 90's. #COLENG # Russia2018 Will you ask #COL ? pic.twitter.com/cNYnbGsyUy
– Alejandro Farffann (@farffanntastico) 4 July 2018
Netizens joined the discussion and some wrote that Colombia could win the game at the office, citing an article in the ESPN digital portal stating that the fourth change "can not be made if the three modifications have been completed within 90 minutes." Therefore, a team that made two changes in regulation time will only have a third change available and not two. "
Are you going to let them fly? England has made 2 changes in overtime and this is not allowed. Do not be Boludos, you have been shamefully stolen. https://t.co/Tc02tZ2go7
– Fandejames (@fansdeJamesARG) 4 July 2018
Netizens joined the discussion and some have written that Colombia could win the party at Office, citing an article in ESPN's digital portal stating that the fourth modification "can only be made if the three modifications have been completed within 90 minutes." Therefore, a team that made two changes in regulatory time will only have a third change available and not two. "
The digital portal Vanguardia from Mexico published an article with the same appointment and this one it was used to question the changes that the coach of England has distributed in the following manner:
Colombia may require the match. The fourth change is allowed if and only if the three changes have been exhausted in the regular time. England made two changes in regulation time and two in overtime. Circle this there is only 24 hours to call. Pilos.https: //t.co/jirIbD7wJl
– Raul Donado Arellano (@ 2RADAR2) 4 July 2018
He changed Eric Dier to Dele Alli in the 81st minute; Jamie Vardy of Raheem Sterling in 88 & c .; Danny Rose by Ashley Young in 102 & Marcus Rashford by Kyle Walker in 113 & # 39;
However, the FIFA in a document published in the context of the Rio 2016 explains that the criteria for making substitutions are as follows:
"A fourth substitute n & # It is allowed that there is an extension.The option can be used, whether the team has already exhausted its three changes in regulation time or not. "
According to the circular Number 13 of International Football Association Board (IFAB), the body that decides the rules of football, "this opportunity benefits the game is decided in the extension, that is to say he does not reach penalties, and reduces possible injuries caused by fatigue. "
The violation of the rules by England sparked the questioning of match arbitration. In his program on the Telesur network, the former Argentinean Diego Armando Maradona stated that Colombians had been victims of a "monumental flight over the yard" by the referee Mark Geiger.
Article
Argentina claimed to have "very clear" that the American referee Mark Geiger "invented" a criminal who led to the victory of England
"I apologize to all the Colombian people but the players are not to blame for this, here is a gentleman who decides , a referee who can no longer google a game of, "adds the legend of Argentine football.
The answer will soon be FIFA .In a statement sent to AFP regrets the statements of Maradona:
" FIFA regrets reading these statements of a player who wrote the history of our sport (…) and strongly disapproves criticism of the referees' performance, which he considers positive in a difficult and very emotional match. "
The official rules state that the England national team has not incurred any irregularities and will be able to play the quarterfinals next Saturday against Sweden. 19659029]
[ad_2]
Source link
