[ad_1]
Lawmakers are pushing ahead with votes on the $ 741 billion defense bill despite repeated threats by Trump to veto it because it does not repeal corporate liability protections in line. Hoyer predicted the House would muster enough votes to overturn a veto if necessary. It’s unclear whether the GOP-led Senate will do the same.
“I am very happy that we have reached a bipartisan and bicameral agreement on the NDAA and I hope [it] Massively pass both Houses next week, and if necessary, reverse a veto threat from President Trump, ”Hoyer told the House.
“I hope we will meet on this bill,” he added. “It was a tough conference but a good conference, and the result, I think, can be supported by the sides of the aisle.”
Trump lifted a surprise veto threat on Tuesday, pledging to rescind the NDAA if it did not include the repeal of the social media shield, known as Section 230. The Trump administration has pushed in recent weeks to block the repeal on the inescapable bill.
Trump also vowed to veto the NDAA over the summer if the bill forces the military to rename bases that honor Confederate leaders. The final bill contains a provision that would do so over the next three years.
Lawmakers on both sides largely sidestepped the threat, noting that the law is not a military matter and falls outside the purview of armed services committees.
Trump doubled down on his veto threat Thursday and Friday on Twitter, criticizing Inhofe, a close ally, for not including the provision in the final bill.
“Very sadly for our nation, it looks like Senator @JimInhofe will not put the termination clause of Article 230 in the defense bill”, Trump wrote on Twitter on Thursday. “So bad for our national security and our electoral integrity. Last chance to do it. I’m going VETO!”
Trump also retweeted messages from Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Josh Hawley of Missouri on Friday, both of whom support the repeal of Section 230 of the Defense Bill.
Inhofe tried to convince Trump that a repeal of Section 230 would endanger the bill, which has become law every year for 59 consecutive years.
Like Trump, the Oklahoma Republican is similarly dug. He praised Trump on Friday and said he agreed “100% to the need for a complete repeal of Section 230”, but Inhofe also argued in a statement that he could not risk The law project. tank on the problem.
“It is unfortunate that members of Congress on both sides of the aisle do not agree with the need for a complete repeal – but, because of this, it is impossible to add a repeal to the section. 230 to the defense authorization bill, “Inhofe said.
“The only other option would mean that for the first time in 60 years, we wouldn’t have an NDAA,” he said. “Without an NDAA, our troops would not receive a flight bonus. They would not receive a risk premium or any other specialty pay that requires annual clearance for our overseas service members to get what they need.
[ad_2]
Source link