[ad_1]
With the first day of October, not only are new waves of content on the many streaming services, but a whole new batch of horror titles that everyone is eager to present to a horror-hungry audience for a spooky season. While Netflix will be releasing original horror content throughout the month, it’s the controversial movie they added today that audiences should be aware of, the 2012s. The inner demon. Unlike movies like I spit on your grave Where Cannibal holocaust which made headlines and became infamous for gratuitous violence, The Devil Inside reached its level of infamy for a different reason. Spoilers follow!
Released following the success of Paranormal Activity and the heyday of Hollywood studios looking for cheap horror movies, The inner demon debuted in January 2012 and quickly drew taunts from audiences around the world. So what was it that got him so much hate? For the context, the film tells the story of a young woman finding her mother who would have killed three people twenty years before while an exorcism was performed on her. When the movie comes to its conclusion, although the action quickly ends in a big moment (much like other movies in the found footage subgenre like The Blair Witch Project). Subsequently, a title card apparently implying that the rest of the film was to be seen on the internet once the audience got home appeared on screen. This is one of the reasons the film would score the rare feat of an “F” CinemaScore.
From there, the “end” or absence of this film pushed the film into legend. Audience members who were there can’t forget it and how they felt cheated while those who weren’t aware of it all sometimes can’t believe that this is how the movie ended. .
But what if that was not the intention of the filmmakers at all? What if for almost a decade the public got it all wrong?
Speaking previously in an interview with The movie crypt Podcast, The inner demon Director William Brent Bell opened up to the conclusion, noting that the film was produced as an independent film and the decision to end the film came long before they were acquired by Paramount Pictures. Even after the studio secured the distribution rights for the film and the relentless testing selection process began, the tests continually came back positive, with audiences genuinely reacting to the quick end.
On the podcast, Bell noted, “Then at the last second the last thing the Paramount chairman said was,” There are a few storylines that aren’t finished and I think they’re going to be confused. if we put a card at the end of the movie that says, “Go to this website” and basically those are the DVD extras on this website? “… will break the Internet with this. None of us watched it like the movie wasn’t finished and you have to go see it to understand the rest. It was just DVD extras, cut scenes, it was just extra. “
The filmmaker further revealed that when adding this title card, the executive who made the suggestion failed to show up, which sparked debate on where it should appear. Bell argued that it should appear at the end of the credits, with someone else arguing for right after the cut, and at the end, as we know, they won. He went on to say that if they had done what they had done before and tested this cut, they would have known how poorly it was played by audiences.
“It’s one thing to end the movie abruptly, but then to throw up that was like an insult to injury,” Bell said. “When it was a bold choice to end the movie like that, but then to say it gave a bad impression and people took it the wrong way. If we had put it at the end of the credits, that wouldn’t probably wouldn’t have been a problem., that part of it, and that would have been a bold ending. “
In the end, The Devil Inside still grossed over $ 100 million at the global box office. Unfortunately, the website that hosted “The Rossi Files”, the URL viewers were directed to at the end of the film, no longer works and the title card at the end of the movie. The inner demon has been relegated to the history of misguided cinematic moments.
[ad_2]
Source link