[ad_1]
Government party activists and dissident Chavistas criticize what has been the Fourth Congress of the Unified Socialist Party of Venezuela to date. They claim that it was a space in which the internal crisis was revealed within the organization founded by President Hugo Chávez, in which its leaders put into practice their authoritarian characteristics.
Former government allies say that there was no real discussion with activism or a transparent election of its delegates. They point out that the fingerprints of the Directive and the plenipotentiary powers granted to Nicolás Maduro did not respect the founding statutes of the red canopy.
Maripili Hernández, former Minister of Youth, was one of the first to criticize the plenary. "I really wanted to make a mistake on this PSUV congress, goodbye to participatory and protagonist democracy, which has only remained as a beautiful expression in the constitution and the constitution." Too scared of the base that chooses and s & rsquo; "What would Chávez say?", He wrote Monday night on Twitter.
Demands for greater democracy within the party also came from the grbadroots and from some leaders like Elías Jaua and Adán Chávez. "If there were no problems of internal democracy, no one could have claimed it, but the lack of it has become manifest and exponential", he said. said Héctor Navarro, a former Chavez minister who was expelled from the PSUV National Directorate. He added that in this IV Congress repeated the undemocratic formula of the previous one, in which he proposed a list of members and asked that it be approved "by acclamation and without discussion."
Monday in plenary session Diosdado Cabello, vice president of the PSUV He ratified Maduro as president of the party and ignored the requests of certain sectors of Chavismo who had asked that the new office be elected by vote and not by the finger.
"What Hugo Chávez wanted and demanded when he decided to replace the MVR with the PSUV, was a democratic party governed by militant-approved statutes, which was simply ignored and became a party in the world. "Anti-democracy has nothing to envy to Democratic Action or Copei," Navarro said.
"This IV Congress proves that the PSUV is a party that uses the word democracy to pretend what is not, or has never been, in practice, they are monarchical and authoritarian," said Nicmer Evans, dissident Chavez and a member of Front Broad.
He explained that, according to the status of the PSUV, the authorities are elected by cooptation or election of the base, but in this opportunity has not been met with any of them.
No more populism. For Olly Millán, former Minister of Popular Economy, the IV Congress of the PSUV took place in the midst of aspects unfavorable to the plutocracy that controls the party. He said that the lack of discussions and attention to the basics, reveals that in the government party there is no interest in solving the crisis – either within the PSUV or the country – so they ratify the same directive without hearing criticisms about management because they are content to "close the ranks around a reality that they do not want to look at".
Millán pointed out that the PSUV must be re-founded. He pointed out that it is an involutionary party with a plutocratic leadership that practices clientelism on the basics to stay in power. "The reality is that the number of votes that they have is the result of cheeky partisan management," he added.
Navarro stated that the statements of Freddy Bernal – who claimed that the current government was responsible for the crisis – opinion of the basic activism and average leadership of the PSUV and that they agree that is not qualified for his position.
[ad_2]
Source link
