[ad_1]
The Inclusion Initiative of USC Annenberg published a study that shows the inequality of gender, race, and disability in more than a thousand Hollywood films.
Hollywood saw the struggle of different social groups for inclusion in the most-watched cinema in the world. This study from the University of Southern California shows that despite popular perception, little has changed in a decade on screen.
The Representative Sample
To develop this study, the Inclusion Initiative badyzed each character with: Dialogue within 1,100 films released between 2007 and 2017: the hundred most popular each year. That is, nearly 49 thousand characters were broken down to study the presence in the most-seen cinema of different genres, bodily abilities, races, and other contextual variables.
The study also focused on the roles behind cameras in these over a thousand movies. They badyzed the presence of directors, composers, writers and producers to indicate races, genders, handicaps and other variables
The results
The conclusions of this research team are not not encouraging. Not only has there been no significant changes in the on-screen representation of gender, race or persons with disabilities, but the numbers for different vulnerable groups are minimal.
The 2017 sample included 4,454 characters with dialogues, of which 70.7% were found to be white, 12.1% were black, 6.2% were Hispanic, 4.8% were Asian. 3.9% were mixed race, 1.7% were of Middle Eastern origin and less than 1% were Native Americans.
The LGBT + community has also not been specifically featured in Hollywood's most popular films. Although bands like Moonlight (2016) or M & # 39; call by your name (2017) give the impression of greater representation, in 2017 99% of characters with dialogues in Hollywood cinema were heterobadual and cisgender whereas in 81 films out of 100, there was no character in the LGBT + community
The cinema Hollywood was not fair to people with disabilities: only 2.5% of characters with dialogues in 2017 had a disability either mental (26.8%), communication (30.4% ) or physical (61.6%). 73% of the total disabled characters were white
Regarding the question of gender, only 31.8% of the characters in these films are women . In other words, there is a woman speaking on the screen for 2.3 men. In addition, only 33% of the films studied in 2017 have a female protagonist. This contrasts with the demographics of the US population, which is 50.8% female.
Behind the Scenes
Figures such as Patty Jenkins, Ava Duvernay or Greta Gerwig give greater visibility to filmmakers in Hollywood. However, it is more of an optical illusion than a rude reality. The Annenberg study indicates that in 1100 films with 1,223 directors, 91.7% are white, 5.2% black and 3.1% Asian. Of the 1,223 directors, only 4.3% are women . With regard to music composition, out of 1 218 composers, only 1.3% are women
Possible solutions?
According to the Inclusion Initiative of the USC Annenberg, there are ways to change this exclusion panorama . If you want to achieve gender equity, for example, you can add five women per year to each scenario (in terms of characters that speak). Thus, by 2020, there will be parity.
This initiative also offers a few lines of d & # 39, action, as quotas for inclusion by the film industry, investor activism studios, create inclusive lists to consider the professionals of each branch, among others.
The full study in English can be downloaded from the Initiative Annenberg Inclusion page
[ad_2]
Source link
